Teams

LA - Ladybugs 2.5-3.5

2025 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-13vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri WomenWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Phillips / Angelica Weaver vs Annie Carmona / Jennifer Sung6-3, 6-3
2025-08-17vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri WomenLost 01
L#2 DoublesAngelica Weaver / Vy Bui vs Debbie Maringka / Jennifer Sung3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAngelica Weaver / Veronika Zherdeva vs Lisa Haroutunian / Kate Davies5-7, 3-6
2025-07-26vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri WomenLost 12
W#1 DoublesAudrey Thomas / Randi Robins vs Andrea Hutchman / Kimberly Vogt6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Phillips / Alexandra Carrethers vs Joy Cho / Catie Langston1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMetta Girma / Melinda Martinez vs Brenda Pokorny / Caroline Tran0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Veronika Zherdeva
published
3.27
Audrey Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Angelica Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.79
Alexandra Carrethers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Randi Robins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Vy Bui
published
2.47
Lauren Miranda
published
2.38
Luz Herrera
published
2.15
Ievgeniia Ostrovska
published
2.08
Alyssa Jeong Perry
published 2.5
2.08
Melinda Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Metta Girma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Martinez + Lauren Miranda4452% games+5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronika Zherdeva
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Audrey Thomas
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Angelica Weaver
29W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Alexandra Carrethers
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Randi Robins
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Vy Bui
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Lauren Miranda
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Luz Herrera
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Ievgeniia Ostrovska
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Alyssa Jeong Perry
6W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Melinda Martinez
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Metta Girma
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.