Teams

LA LLW Triple the Fun - Doree Shafrir

2025 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Women 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.27 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-13vs LA - Triple DoublesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHarriet Fraser / Kate Davies vs Jennifer Bevan / Ki Hyun Park4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDoree Shafrir / Audra DeFranco vs Michelle Horvitz / Bahareh Saedi7-5, 6-3
2025-09-07vs LA - Ladybugs 2.5-3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHarriet Fraser / Tara Zinnamon vs Audrey Thomas / Randi Robins1-6, 2-6
2025-08-24vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri WomenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Haroutunian / Mori Einsidler vs Melanie Minichino / Meaghan Curcio6-1, 6-1
2025-08-23vs LA - Triple DoublesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHarriet Fraser / Kate Davies vs Shannon Malik / Nicole Weiss5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Kain / Vanessa Katz vs Bethany Nelson / Nas Cohen6-4, 6-2
2025-08-17vs LA - Triple DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Haroutunian / Kate Davies vs Katy Burgess / Nicole Weiss1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-16vs LA - Ladybugs 2.5-3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Faeh / Nataliya Padilla vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVanessa Katz / Tara Zinnamon vs Randi Robins / Luz Herrera6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDoree Shafrir / Audra DeFranco vs Melinda Martinez / Ievgeniia Ostrovska6-2, 6-2
2025-08-03vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri WomenWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Haroutunian / Tanya Kripalani vs Catie Langston / Shelly Cohen6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmanda Kain / Uyen Chu vs Jasmin Miller / Rebeka St. Michel7-5, 6-3
2025-08-02vs LA - Ladybugs 2.5-3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Haroutunian / Kate Davies vs Angelica Weaver / Veronika Zherdeva7-5, 6-3
2025-07-13vs LA - Canyon Coyotes Tri WomenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Davies / Nataliya Padilla vs Melanie Minichino / Christine Russell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Kain / Uyen Chu vs Jennifer Sung / J Patel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Lisa Haroutunian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Amanda Kain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Kate Davies
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Tara Zinnamon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Harriet Fraser
published
3.20
Uyen Chu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Mori Einsidler
published
3.19
Nataliya Padilla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Danielle Demianczyk
published 3.5
3.04
Audra DeFranco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Vanessa Katz
published
2.99
Alexandra Faeh
published 3
2.95
Kimberly Ndombe
published
2.91
Doree Shafrir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Meredith Cruse
published
2.71
Rachael Alberti
published
2.68
JoAnn Ishii
published
2.62
Neha Desai
published
2.53
Cindy Emanuel
published 3
2.48
Liz Piotrowski
published
2.46
Amanda Lie
published 3
2.45
Farhana Pargac
published
Tanya Kripalani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harriet Fraser + Kate Davies5068% games+12.0% vs expected
Amanda Kain + Kate Davies7162% games+7.7% vs expected
Amanda Kain + Uyen Chu25861% games+3.9% vs expected
Harriet Fraser + Nataliya Padilla4154% games+3.0% vs expected
Meredith Cruse + JoAnn Ishii211056% games+1.8% vs expected
Audra DeFranco + Doree Shafrir241653% games+0.3% vs expected
Nataliya Padilla + Kate Davies4353% games−1.0% vs expected
Amanda Kain + Lisa Haroutunian9067% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Haroutunian
60W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
Amanda Kain
117W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
3.5
Kate Davies
53W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Tara Zinnamon
55W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Harriet Fraser
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Uyen Chu
54W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Mori Einsidler
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Nataliya Padilla
60W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Danielle Demianczyk
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Audra DeFranco
76W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Vanessa Katz
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Alexandra Faeh
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kimberly Ndombe
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Doree Shafrir
93W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Meredith Cruse
35W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Rachael Alberti
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
JoAnn Ishii
34W–25L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Neha Desai
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Cindy Emanuel
17W–29L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Liz Piotrowski
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Amanda Lie
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Farhana Pargac
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Tanya Kripalani
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.