Teams

IE-Canyon Crest-Kay

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - IE · IE Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-24vs IE-LLW-MTC-ShelterLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Giles / Heidi Brun vs Rosa Galeas-Vamadeva / Karen Martinez2-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs IE-Vista Murrieta-HarnedLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Heidi Brun vs April Mays / Lisa Otten5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSesilie Kay / Susan Swieca vs Sofie Carpenter / Tessie Rivera0-6, 0-6
2025-03-08vs IE-Andulka-CurtissLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Sharon Hebert vs Jane Magro / Jill Schoner5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Bobo / Shelley Mellentine vs GINA SKIBAR / Valoria Jones6-7, 3-6
2025-02-23vs IE-LLW-MTC-ShelterLost 02
L#1 DoublesHeidi Brun / Janet Giles vs Lisa Payne / Andrea Van Soest0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Bobo / Susan Swieca vs Louissa Dyer / Karen Martinez0-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs IE-Andulka-CurtissSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Janet Giles vs Jill Schoner / Rebekah Tsai6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Brun / Sesilie Kay vs Dorothy Geiger / Elizabeth Curtiss2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-01vs IE-Canyon Lake-FurlongWon 20
W#2 DoublesKathalena Cocker / Janet Giles vs Heidi Schumaker / Therese Washle6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSesilie Kay / Heidi Brun vs Danette Conlin / Sandy Wible4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-18vs IE-Redlands-YoungLost 02
L#2 DoublesHeidi Brun / Jordan Ray vs Laura Hibbard / Michelle Rai2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSesilie Kay / Jeannie Adair vs Patti Aguirre / Cesaria Vazquez1-6, 2-6
2025-01-12vs IE-TCC-DanielsLost 02
L#1 SinglesHeidi Brun vs Veronica Saucedo4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Garrett / Sesilie Kay vs Raylynn Roland / Anne Neal1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Alexa Stanfield
published 4
3.73
Jordan Ray
published
3.39
Janet Giles
published
3.31
Kathalena Cocker
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Laura Acosta
published
3.26
Sharon Hebert
published
3.23
Heidi Brun
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.81
Susan Swieca
published
2.73
Sesilie Kay
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.72
Jacqueline Bobo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jeannie Adair
published
Shelley Mellentine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexa Stanfield + Jordan Ray5161% games+6.7% vs expected
Sesilie Kay + Heidi Brun6350% games+0.9% vs expected
Jacqueline Bobo + Sesilie Kay4446% gamesnot enough data
Kathalena Cocker + Sharon Hebert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alexa Stanfield
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
Jordan Ray
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Janet Giles
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Kathalena Cocker
136W–140L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
Laura Acosta
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Sharon Hebert
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Heidi Brun
139W–89L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Susan Swieca
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.81
3
Sesilie Kay
134W–145L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Jacqueline Bobo
30W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Jeannie Adair
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Mellentine
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.