Teams

BARC - Shot Girls

*2023 Houston Fall League (2022)NA Friday Ladies Day League · 3.5 Ladies Doubles

20 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Donna Miller
published 3.5
3.52
Annalyn Picken
published 4
3.42
Betsy Kenck
published 3.5
3.37
Kim Fuke
published
3.35
ZandraZophia Jones
published
3.35
Linda Jacobs
published
3.29
Lindsay Youngdahl
published
3.26
Judy Peake
published
Barbara Starr
published 3.5
3.25
Leah Powell
published
3.22
Marjorie Seiter
published
3.11
Marina Pronina
published
2.97
Pam Saddler
published
2.97
Marina Houghtaling
published
2.82
Diane Skoronski
published 3
2.79
Pat Dunlop
published
Brenda Faxel
published 3
Michelle Holland
published
Roxanne Kamins
published
Sheetal Patel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Holland + Judy Peake314 matchesnot enough data
Pat Dunlop + Pam Saddler213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Fuke + ZandraZophia Jones033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Miller
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.59
4
Annalyn Picken
30W–29L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Betsy Kenck
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Kim Fuke
57W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
ZandraZophia Jones
15W–23L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.35
Linda Jacobs
47W–78L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.35
Lindsay Youngdahl
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.29
Judy Peake
58W–33L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Starr
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leah Powell
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Marjorie Seiter
25W–33L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Marina Pronina
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Pam Saddler
21W–51L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
Marina Houghtaling
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Diane Skoronski
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
Pat Dunlop
5W–25L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.79
3
Brenda Faxel
1W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Holland
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roxanne Kamins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheetal Patel
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.