Teams

SILVER CREEK CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-06vs CHAMISAL TC CM7.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Nguyen / Matthew Wagoner vs Matthew Wetzel / Rob Simpson7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Alok Sanghavi
published 4
3.84
Gaurav Arya
published 4
3.84
Roy Pacumio
published
3.83
Pranit Sethi
published
3.78
Chalam Kalahasti
published 4
3.73
Rajiv Khattar
published
3.68
Nitish Korla
published
3.65
Vittorio Viarengo
published
3.64
Matthew Wagoner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Michael Stebbins
published
3.53
Rodley Fabie
published
3.36
Bernardo Fourcade
published 3.5
3.33
Daven Mody
published 3.5
3.31
Rick Pittenger
published
3.19
Gary Tomasello
published 3.5
3.17
Jaideep Jain
published 3.5
3.11
Hanjoon Kim
published 3.5
Richard Grabinger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alok Sanghavi + Pranit Sethi7162% games+9.3% vs expected
Nitish Korla + Gaurav Arya2348% games−7.2% vs expected
Rick Pittenger + Jaideep Jain3344% gamesnot enough data
Chalam Kalahasti + Nitish Korla3254% gamesnot enough data
Rick Pittenger + Rodley Fabie314 matchesnot enough data
Jaideep Jain + Bernardo Fourcade213 matchesnot enough data
Alok Sanghavi + Rajiv Khattar123 matchesnot enough data
Rodley Fabie + Daven Mody303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alok Sanghavi
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Gaurav Arya
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Roy Pacumio
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Pranit Sethi
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Chalam Kalahasti
10W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Rajiv Khattar
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Nitish Korla
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Vittorio Viarengo
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.65
Matthew Wagoner
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.64
Michael Stebbins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Rodley Fabie
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Bernardo Fourcade
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Daven Mody
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Rick Pittenger
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Gary Tomasello
8W–25L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Jaideep Jain
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Hanjoon Kim
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Richard Grabinger
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.