Teams

SILVER CREEK 55AW7.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Melanie Sendek
published
3.38
Pari Pham
published
3.37
Stacie Pittenger
published
3.28
Michelle Ney
published
3.24
Maryam Malekian
published
3.22
Deborah Hao
published 3.5
3.11
Mirta Luque
published
3.02
Elaine Chiu
published
2.90
Erna Nishime
published
2.49
Cindy Monroe
published 3
2.38
Diane Foley
published 3
Judy Taylor
published
Lisa Stanziale
published
Phyllis Seeger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Pittenger + Pari Pham3347% games+3.1% vs expected
Erna Nishime + Stacie Pittenger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Sendek
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Pari Pham
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stacie Pittenger
15W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
Michelle Ney
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Maryam Malekian
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Deborah Hao
10W–25L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Mirta Luque
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.11
Elaine Chiu
8W–23L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
Erna Nishime
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Cindy Monroe
2W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Diane Foley
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.38
Judy Taylor
37W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Stanziale
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Phyllis Seeger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.