Teams

Smith/Greenbrier/Reb

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-13vs Harrison/Bucur/GHS/LRACWon 21
W#1 DoublesMorgan Bridgforth / Hannah Lewis vs Sarah Wengel / Kyla Bryant6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Quilao / Courtney Newell vs Jennifer Bailey / Melanie Bobo6-1, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDana Rodriguez / Jennifer Baptist vs Karen Koen / Becky Sherman4-6, 1-6
2025-08-07vs Raines/LR/PVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Baptist / Marjorie Rogers vs Jenni Orahood / Olivia Fisher3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTiffani Jedlicka / Jennifer Quilao vs Courtney Cisne / Courtney Jones6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Steel / Brooke Smith vs Amanda Piechocki / Megan Adams6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-05vs Harrison/Bucur/GHS/LRACWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Baptist / Dana Rodriguez vs Meritt Harrison / Anita Bucur3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMorgan Bridgforth / Hannah Lewis vs Sarah Wengel / Lynette Bowersock6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Quilao / Mary Turriff vs Maria Olmos / LoisAnn Hale6-3, 7-6
2025-07-28vs Raines/LR/PVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAustynn Crocker / Marjorie Rogers vs Jenni Orahood / Eden Raines6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTiffani Jedlicka / Courtney Newell vs Courtney Cisne / Courtney Jones3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Smith / Julie Steel vs Kathryn McMillian / Amanda Piechocki7-5, 6-4
2025-07-09vs Raines/LR/PVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAustynn Crocker / Marjorie Rogers vs Whitney Ewersmann / Eden Raines1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Turriff / Colleen Youngdahl vs Jennifer Adkins / Meredith Reddmann6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTiffani Jedlicka / Brooke Smith vs Megan Adams / Martha Blodgett6-1, 6-1
2025-06-23vs Harrison/Bucur/GHS/LRACWon 21
L#1 DoublesDana Rodriguez / Jennifer Baptist vs Karen Koen / Becky Sherman0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Quilao / Colleen Youngdahl vs Stephanie Birdsong / Jennifer Bailey7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Smith / Morgan Bridgforth vs Kristi Cortright / Lynette Bowersock6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Austynn Crocker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Jennifer Baptist
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.96
Colleen Youngdahl
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.95
Dana Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Jennifer Quilao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Marjorie Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Courtney Newell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Mary Turriff
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Tiffani Jedlicka
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.43
Brooke Smith
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.37
Morgan Bridgforth
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.34
Julie Steel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Hannah Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Newell + Tiffani Jedlicka3447% games−2.3% vs expected
Jennifer Baptist + Dana Rodriguez134 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Smith + Tiffani Jedlicka404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Baptist + Marjorie Rogers033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Turriff + Colleen Youngdahl213 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Youngdahl + Tiffani Jedlicka303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Quilao + Tiffani Jedlicka303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Austynn Crocker
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
Jennifer Baptist
22W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Colleen Youngdahl
50W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4.5
Dana Rodriguez
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.95
Jennifer Quilao
46W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
Marjorie Rogers
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Courtney Newell
34W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Mary Turriff
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Tiffani Jedlicka
82W–36L career · 10 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brooke Smith
52W–22L career · 13 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.43
Morgan Bridgforth
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.37
Julie Steel
44W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
4
Hannah Lewis
28W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.