Teams

ACAC Mixed Up

2022 Charlottesville Mixed 40 & Over · Charlottesville

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-01vs Scared HitlessLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Hollen / Lester Yuen vs Robert Emery / Stacy Moren0-6, 1-6
2022-07-17vs Scared HitlessLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Bayliss / Gregory Parrish vs Amy Taggart / Ben Jorgensen1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChristopher Raupp / Beth Hollen vs Bret Harris / Allison Ewing3-6, 2-6
2022-07-10vs Scared HitlessLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Raupp / Beth Hollen vs Edward Lis / Amy Taggart2-6, 3-6
2022-06-29vs Scared HitlessLost 01
L#3 DoublesRonald Waddell / Beth Hollen vs Rene Roy / Judy Roy4-6, 4-6
2022-06-28vs Scared HitlessWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth Hollen / William Manning vs Noel Jorgensen / Bret Harris7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs Scared HitlessLost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Bayliss / William Manning vs Noel Jorgensen / Bret Harris4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Sowers / Christopher Raupp vs Stephanie Hall / Russell Ridings3-6, 2-6
2022-06-05vs Scared HitlessLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Manning / Beth Hollen vs Robert Emery / Stephanie Hall3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
William Manning
published
3.74
Derek Frazier
published 4
3.73
Tammy Hertel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.26
Melissa Hoover
published
3.25
Beth Hollen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Gregory Parrish
published 3.5
3.00
Susan Bayliss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Christopher Raupp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ronald Waddell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Hollen + Christopher Raupp134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Bayliss + Christopher Raupp033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Manning
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Derek Frazier
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Tammy Hertel
150W–111L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Melissa Hoover
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Beth Hollen
172W–171L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gregory Parrish
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Susan Bayliss
161W–227L career · 2 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Christopher Raupp
32W–84L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.00
Ronald Waddell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.