Teams

Grip & Rip Coleman RTC

2025 USTA League Tennis Adult 18 & Over Summer-RO · 3.5 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesSarah Bauer / Jennifer Noiles vs Sarah Chalmers / Lisa Teske6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLixia Yang vs Diana Kelm6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesEvelyn Carroll vs Daniela Stan1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos / Madison Couser vs Amy Crockett / Kerry Kechely6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesTorrey Bakke / Jean Herda vs Anne Colby / Jodi Kruse4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Brittany Luther1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Coleman / Jessica Balcom vs Amy Crockett / Tracy Milligan2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEvelyn Carroll vs Caitlin Roth6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMagdalena Geske / Eileen Anderson vs Chloe Corey / Diana Kelm2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTorrey Bakke / Madison Couser vs Jodi Kruse / Jane Cerhan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLixia Yang vs Bernadetta Elder6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRaelene Shufelt / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos vs Sarah Chalmers / Dawn Wildfeuer3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMarina Walther-Antonio vs Brittany Luther1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLihong He / Jane Rosenman vs Tracy Milligan / Daniela Stan7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLixia Yang / Torrey Bakke vs Anne Colby / Amy Crockett6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Jessica Wang6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMagdalena Geske / Melanie Lyden vs Dawn Wildfeuer / Jodi Kruse7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Heshan Liu2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Anderson / Amy Czaplewski vs Daniela Stan / Chloe Corey6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJessica Balcom / Melissa Coleman vs Jodi Kruse / Caitlin Roth2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Sarah Chalmers3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Raelene Shufelt vs Lisa Teske / Jane Cerhan2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMarina Walther-Antonio vs Bernadetta Elder6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Jean Herda vs Kerry Kechely / Amy Crockett6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTorrey Bakke / Lixia Yang vs Jodi Kruse / Kerry Kechely7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Jessica Wang3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Yuki Munden vs Daniela Stan / Dawn Wildfeuer7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Sarah Chalmers1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMagdalena Geske / Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos vs Anne Colby / Tracy Milligan1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesYuki Munden / Jean Herda vs Jessica Wang / Caitlin Roth4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Noiles vs Katia Pytel6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMelissa Coleman / Madison Couser vs Lisa Teske / Jane Cerhan1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMarina Walther-Antonio vs Heshan Liu6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelanie Lyden / Magdalena Geske vs Daniela Stan / Diana Kelm7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTorrey Bakke / Lixia Yang vs Brittany Luther / Sarah Chalmers6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Bauer vs Jessica Wang6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Czaplewski / Yuki Munden vs Heshan Liu / Amy Crockett6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMarina Walther-Antonio vs Chloe Corey6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos / Raelene Shufelt vs Lisa Teske / Caitlin Roth1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJessica Balcom / Lixia Yang vs Caitlin Roth / Kerry Kechely6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLihong He vs Jessica Wang3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Coleman / Madison Couser vs Anne Colby / Dawn Wildfeuer6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesEvelyn Carroll vs Brittany Luther1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEileen Anderson / Jane Rosenman vs Chloe Corey / Heshan Liu1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Lixia Yang
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Sarah Bauer
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.32
Jennifer Noiles
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.25
Lihong He
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.21
Yuki Munden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Marina Walther-Antonio
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
3.15
Torrey Bakke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Jean Herda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Madison Couser
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
3.07
Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Julie Freidhoff
published
3.06
Amy Czaplewski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Evelyn Carroll
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.94
Melanie Lyden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Jessica Balcom
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Jane Rosenman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Raelene Shufelt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Melissa Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.71
Magdalena Geske
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.68
Eileen Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Magdalena Geske + Melanie Lyden3447% games+2.9% vs expected
Amy Czaplewski + Jean Herda2545% games−3.8% vs expected
Raelene Shufelt + Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos0623% games−23.9% vs expected
Melissa Coleman + Eileen Anderson314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Freidhoff + Yuki Munden134 matchesnot enough data
Raelene Shufelt + Melanie Lyden134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Rosenman + Eileen Anderson314 matchesnot enough data
Yuki Munden + Lixia Yang314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lixia Yang
29W–9L career · 12 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Sarah Bauer
22W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Jennifer Noiles
24W–14L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Lihong He
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Yuki Munden
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Marina Walther-Antonio
26W–17L career · 11 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Torrey Bakke
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jean Herda
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Madison Couser
25W–17L career · 10 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gabriella Bedekovicsne-Gajdos
5W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Julie Freidhoff
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Amy Czaplewski
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Evelyn Carroll
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Melanie Lyden
30W–23L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Jessica Balcom
29W–26L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jane Rosenman
15W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Raelene Shufelt
2W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.84
Melissa Coleman
13W–16L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
Magdalena Geske
9W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Eileen Anderson
14W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.