← Search

Julie Freidhoff

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 33W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history72 matches
L
2026-06-03 · Net Smashers Couser RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Lyden
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Bedekovicsne-Rackets RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yuki Munden
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-3
L
2026-03-29 · Bedekovicsne-Rackets RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yuki Munden
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-26 · Bedekovicsne-Rackets RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yuki Munden
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-03-23 · Still Smashing Chalmers RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mabel Ryder
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-03-16 · Still Smashing Chalmers RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yuki Munden
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-09 · New kids on the block Gupta/Ryder RAC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yu Shi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-16 · New kids on the block Gupta/Ryder RAC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Hurley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-02 · New kids on the block Gupta/Ryder RAC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julian Currie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-01-12 · New kids on the block Gupta/Ryder RAC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julian Currie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-13 · Terminetters - Chambers RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Chambers
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-29 · Terminetters - Chambers RTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Chambers
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
42.9%
21W–28L · 47.8% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.2% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams