Teams

RMTC NAVY

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-14vs TTA GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeaghan Spiegel / Ann Hensley vs Alecia Phillips / Debby Melvin6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTamny Costello vs SARA CONWAY4-6, 1-6
2024-08-26vs CVTA REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Meaghan Spiegel vs Steffani Hafner / Emily Vigmostad6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-25vs NJ ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Meaghan Spiegel vs Nina Miranda / Meredith Beveridge7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTamny Costello vs Dorelle Peters7-6, 4-2
2024-08-17vs BRMST GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeaghan Spiegel / Kelly Bassin vs Jody Knaley / Sarah Hertzenberg6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTamny Costello vs Tracy Klein2-6, 6-7
2024-08-12vs NJ BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Kelly Bassin vs Anne Townsel / Nicole Cotta6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTamny Costello vs Zhenzhen Yu0-6, 3-6
2024-07-22vs CVTA YELLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Hensley / Lori Mason vs Michaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Meaghan Spiegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Ann Hensley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Kelly Bassin
published
2.81
Jen Hutman
published 3
2.75
Carol Hoeffler
published 3
2.74
Tamny Costello
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Lori Mason
published
2.44
Robin Noble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meaghan Spiegel + Ann Hensley7652% games+5.6% vs expected
Robin Noble + Carol Hoeffler5647% games−1.6% vs expected
Ann Hensley + Tamny Costello3447% gamesnot enough data
Meaghan Spiegel + Tamny Costello123 matchesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Robin Noble213 matchesnot enough data
Tamny Costello + Carol Hoeffler213 matchesnot enough data
Lori Mason + Jen Hutman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meaghan Spiegel
53W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3
Ann Hensley
47W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
Kelly Bassin
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Jen Hutman
16W–29L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Carol Hoeffler
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Tamny Costello
44W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Lori Mason
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Robin Noble
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
Kathleen Fitzcallaghan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.