Teams

CVTA YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-04vs BCC GOLDLost 02
L#1 SinglesCristina Torres-Machi vs Amy Nichols4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJodi Ansell / Sara Jensen vs Richelle Burnett / Laura Studebaker2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-26vs BRMST GOLDWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Liz Olynyk vs Tracy Klein / Janine Huber7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCristina Torres-Machi vs Micheline Gardner6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJodi Ansell / Kelly McDevitt vs Valerie Hudson / Susan Cave4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-19vs TTA GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Alecia Phillips / Grace Whitmer6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCristina Torres-Machi vs Allison Ivy6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLiz Olynyk / Kelly McDevitt vs Allison Brickey / Meredith Griffith6-3, 6-3
2024-08-12vs CVTA REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Tia Bach vs Elizabeth Corujo / Emily Vigmostad2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSara Jensen vs Steffani Hafner2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Olynyk / Kelly McDevitt vs Cheryl Cavanaugh / Rashmi Anki2-6, 4-6
2024-08-10vs NJ ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Mary Shugrue / Patti Warner6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSara Jensen vs Dorelle Peters2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLiz Olynyk / Jodi Ansell vs Nina Miranda / Valerie Martin7-6, 6-1
2024-07-29vs NJ BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Janie Trevor / Carolyn Keim6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrea Robbins vs Jennifer Livingston2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSara Jensen / Jodi Ansell vs Zhenzhen Yu / Mary Rose Wilder0-6, 2-6
2024-07-22vs RMTC NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Ann Hensley / Lori Mason6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrea Robbins vs Kelly Bassin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly McDevitt / Tia Bach vs Robin Noble / Mary Sanders2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings43 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC YELLOW701838107
2RRTC PURPLE6118311144
3VC RED6115616157
4LEBTC BLACK6115617166
5CCV YELLOW6114719167
6RRTC YELLOW5216513132
7CACM SILVER5215615157
8KNO PURPLE5215616165
9MVCC YELLOW5214717161
10CCC BLUE5214718164
11NJ WHITE5214718176
12GR YELLOW5213819179
13BRMST SILVER5212919175
14PH PINK5213820187
15TTA PURPLE52111023160
16DTP ORANGE4314716149
17PRC PURPLE4312921198
18WC WHITE43111022172
19MVCC GOLD43111023169
20FOX GREEN43111024199
21CCC RED43101125187
22PCC RED43101126205
23WP-O YELLOW43101126192
24VCC PURPLE3371123180
25CPCC ORANGE34111022168
26CVTA PURPLE34101125196
27GPTC NAVY34101126200
28GCC NAVY3481327208
29CVTA YELLOW3491227200
30LPTC TEAL3491228216
31PRKR WHITE3491228194
32DTP BLUE3481329209
33CHCC GREEN3461532228
34RMTC NAVY2581329216
35EM PINK2571430219
36LTA-Q GOLD2581331210
37WP-G ORANGE2571433229
38SKY GOLD2551634230
39GR BLACK1671428189
40SS-LT PURPLE1651633229
41CR-BP YELLOW1631836224
42TTA SILVER0761532209
43RHCC YELLOW0751635232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Kerry Hanneman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cristina Torres-Machi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Michaela Masciarelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Andrea Robbins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Tia Bach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Liz Olynyk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Sara Jensen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Kelly McDevitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Jodi Ansell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tia Bach + Liz Olynyk5650% games+6.6% vs expected
Kelly McDevitt + Liz Olynyk3257% games+0.2% vs expected
Kerry Hanneman + Michaela Masciarelli111450% games+0.0% vs expected
Tia Bach + Sara Jensen5749% games−0.1% vs expected
Liz Olynyk + Michaela Masciarelli0638% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Ansell + Tia Bach2352% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Ansell + Kelly McDevitt224 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Ansell + Liz Olynyk134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Hanneman
27W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Cristina Torres-Machi
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Michaela Masciarelli
31W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Andrea Robbins
8W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Tia Bach
37W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Liz Olynyk
38W–73L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.60
Sara Jensen
14W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.60
Kelly McDevitt
15W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Jodi Ansell
45W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.