Teams

NJ WHITE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-04vs BP ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Abel / Quinn Riddle vs Melanie Escobar / Molly Buller6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPaige Brennan vs Emily Adams6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Stevens / Katrina Sachs vs Clarissa Manzi / Mara Orchard1-6, 2-6
2024-08-29vs MVCC GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Wierzba / Shelby Treloar vs Kimberly Hitchcock / Kate Colon6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNicole Stevens vs Madeleine Futterman2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Brennan / Katrina Sachs vs Sara Schaffer / Julie Levey3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-26vs NJ YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wierzba / Quinn Riddle vs Mollie Toth / Megan Lewis3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLindsey Martin vs Nohemi Almaraz7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaige Brennan / Shelby Treloar vs Bonita Thistle / Ann Olberding6-0, 6-4
2024-08-14vs LPTC TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Wierzba / Quinn Riddle vs Laurie Lahnert / Claudia Perales6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesShelby Treloar vs Michelle Dolin6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMelanie Abel / Paige Brennan vs Meegan Miloud / Kay Newman6-2, 6-1
2024-08-12vs HIW GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaige Brennan / Shelby Treloar vs Linda Nielander / Kelly Murphy6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole Stevens vs Mary Tribby7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesQuinn Riddle / Melanie Abel vs CAROLINE MCQUEEN / Jennifer Withington3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-29vs RHCC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesQuinn Riddle / Jacqueline Wierzba vs Maria Lucas / Rebecca Jones6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLindsey Martin vs Heidi Wendling6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShelby Treloar / Katrina Sachs vs Amelia Hendrickson / Jennifer Curtis-Jones3-6, 1-6
2024-07-22vs MC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesLindsey Martin / Quinn Riddle vs Ashley Campsie / Kristen Hoffman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicole Stevens vs Katie Policaro6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelanie Abel / Paige Brennan vs Laurie Ross / Robin Vint6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings43 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC YELLOW701838107
2RRTC PURPLE6118311144
3VC RED6115616157
4LEBTC BLACK6115617166
5CCV YELLOW6114719167
6RRTC YELLOW5216513132
7CACM SILVER5215615157
8KNO PURPLE5215616165
9MVCC YELLOW5214717161
10CCC BLUE5214718164
11NJ WHITE5214718176
12GR YELLOW5213819179
13BRMST SILVER5212919175
14PH PINK5213820187
15TTA PURPLE52111023160
16DTP ORANGE4314716149
17PRC PURPLE4312921198
18WC WHITE43111022172
19MVCC GOLD43111023169
20FOX GREEN43111024199
21CCC RED43101125187
22PCC RED43101126205
23WP-O YELLOW43101126192
24VCC PURPLE3371123180
25CPCC ORANGE34111022168
26CVTA PURPLE34101125196
27GPTC NAVY34101126200
28GCC NAVY3481327208
29CVTA YELLOW3491227200
30LPTC TEAL3491228216
31PRKR WHITE3491228194
32DTP BLUE3481329209
33CHCC GREEN3461532228
34RMTC NAVY2581329216
35EM PINK2571430219
36LTA-Q GOLD2581331210
37WP-G ORANGE2571433229
38SKY GOLD2551634230
39GR BLACK1671428189
40SS-LT PURPLE1651633229
41CR-BP YELLOW1631836224
42TTA SILVER0761532209
43RHCC YELLOW0751635232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jacqueline Wierzba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Nicole Stevens
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.77
Shelby Treloar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Quinn Riddle
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.71
Melanie Abel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Katrina Sachs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsey Martin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paige Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Wierzba + Nicole Stevens314 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Wierzba + Quinn Riddle213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jacqueline Wierzba
44W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Nicole Stevens
17W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Shelby Treloar
31W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Quinn Riddle
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
Melanie Abel
40W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
2.71
Katrina Sachs
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsey Martin
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paige Brennan
33W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.