Teams

PH PINK

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-06vs KC-CC TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesAbigail Smith / Jennifer Fahey vs Gina Akins / Renee Martinez4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMerly Utsler vs Carissa Hollander4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Fox / Tara Wolfe vs Elizabeth Crites / Kathy Gravlin6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2024-08-30vs SS-D BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Fahey / Abigail Smith vs Tiffanie Lenderman / Holly Shrewsbury6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMerly Utsler vs Tiffany Steinmetz6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrooke Fox / Stacey Hawes vs Holly Georgelos / Brenda Mahedy7-6, 6-2
2024-08-26vs GR YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrooke Fox / Tara Wolfe vs Heather Killeen / Leann Koontz1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Smith vs Sabrina Pellerin6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmy Stettner / Nancy Waas vs Lori Strike / Tracey Felicidade Jones4-6, 1-6
2024-08-12vs KC-RH GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbigail Smith / Jennifer Fahey vs Allison Coquet / Robin Woelfel3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Stettner vs Erica Smith6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrooke Fox / Stacey Hawes vs Cheryl Amador / VIRGINIA WANG2-6, 6-7
2024-08-05vs LEBTC PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Fox / Tara Wolfe vs Amee Auberry / Jamie Gardner7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Stettner vs Janee Wren1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKate Funk / Merly Utsler vs Philippa Biggi / Robyn Jensen6-4, 6-4
2024-07-29vs SS-LGT YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbigail Smith / Jennifer Fahey vs Nancy Railey-Borchelt / Natalie Borchelt6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMerly Utsler vs Traci Henry3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Fox / Kate Funk vs Jane Lundwall / Nancy Hogue6-2, 6-2
2024-07-22vs BM REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesTara Wolfe / Brooke Fox vs Laura FitzSimmons / Neha Sitole6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKate Funk vs Diana Collins6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMerly Utsler / Nancy Waas vs Lindsey Teets / Kimberly Picchietti2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings43 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC YELLOW701838107
2RRTC PURPLE6118311144
3VC RED6115616157
4LEBTC BLACK6115617166
5CCV YELLOW6114719167
6RRTC YELLOW5216513132
7CACM SILVER5215615157
8KNO PURPLE5215616165
9MVCC YELLOW5214717161
10CCC BLUE5214718164
11NJ WHITE5214718176
12GR YELLOW5213819179
13BRMST SILVER5212919175
14PH PINK5213820187
15TTA PURPLE52111023160
16DTP ORANGE4314716149
17PRC PURPLE4312921198
18WC WHITE43111022172
19MVCC GOLD43111023169
20FOX GREEN43111024199
21CCC RED43101125187
22PCC RED43101126205
23WP-O YELLOW43101126192
24VCC PURPLE3371123180
25CPCC ORANGE34111022168
26CVTA PURPLE34101125196
27GPTC NAVY34101126200
28GCC NAVY3481327208
29CVTA YELLOW3491227200
30LPTC TEAL3491228216
31PRKR WHITE3491228194
32DTP BLUE3481329209
33CHCC GREEN3461532228
34RMTC NAVY2581329216
35EM PINK2571430219
36LTA-Q GOLD2581331210
37WP-G ORANGE2571433229
38SKY GOLD2551634230
39GR BLACK1671428189
40SS-LT PURPLE1651633229
41CR-BP YELLOW1631836224
42TTA SILVER0761532209
43RHCC YELLOW0751635232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Jennifer Fahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Abigail Smith
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.81
Merly Utsler
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Amy Attwood
published 3
2.68
Lisa Bowser
published
2.53
Tara Wolfe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Stettner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
Nancy Waas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Funk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Stacey Hawes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Stettner + Jennifer Fahey4159% games+13.6% vs expected
Kate Funk + Merly Utsler4162% games+11.5% vs expected
Amy Stettner + Tara Wolfe3348% games+6.5% vs expected
Abigail Smith + Jennifer Fahey11453% games+2.6% vs expected
Tara Wolfe + Amy Attwood3546% games−2.9% vs expected
Tara Wolfe + Jennifer Fahey044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Stettner + Stacey Hawes123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Stettner + Lisa Bowser033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Fahey
76W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Abigail Smith
104W–86L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Merly Utsler
45W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Amy Attwood
83W–71L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
Lisa Bowser
30W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%9%91%
2.68
Tara Wolfe
31W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Amy Stettner
25W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Waas
28W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Kate Funk
39W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Hawes
34W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.