Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/ 18AW3.5B

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-25vs CROW CANYON CC 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Nancy Blom vs Lea McSweeney / Dana Kruger7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-07-18vs ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Cherie Charbonneau vs Marci Dublin / Jill Petersen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-07-16vs ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesLani Aurelius / Cherie Charbonneau vs Shawn Young / Michele L Sarkisian6-0, 6-4
2021-07-09vs BAY TREES PK 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Gail Chin vs Trish O'Connor / Isabel Maze3-6, 2-6
2021-07-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Nancy Blom vs Janice Eklem / Susan Jones6-0, 6-3
2021-06-12vs FREMONT TC 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesTammie Prochazka / Lani Aurelius vs Julieta Leong / Kimberly Phillips3-6, 4-6
2021-06-06vs WALNUT CREEK RC/ 18AW3.5CLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Pruden / Lani Aurelius vs Betsy Kemp / Betsy Gwynn0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Cassie Kim
published 4
3.67
3.31
Kathleen Pruden
published
3.29
Tammie Snyder
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
3.15
Pamela Maloney
published
3.10
Teri Frangie
published
2.99
Catherine Sampietro
published 3.5
2.88
Sally Krapf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lani Aurelius + Tammie Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Kim
29W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Cortny Christensen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Kathleen Pruden
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Tammie Snyder
24W–15L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Pamela Maloney
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Catherine Sampietro
3W–12L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Cherie Charbonneau
12W–25L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%18%
2.88
Sally Krapf
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.