Teams

CROW CANYON CC 18AW3.5A

2021 ADULT 18 & Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-07-18vs BAY TREES PK 18AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Rovner / Susan Tricca vs Julie Borjon / Kara Crowe1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-26vs FREMONT TC 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesRattana Graff / Margaret Harrison vs Daliyati Firdaus / April Mempin6-1, 6-1
2021-06-19vs BAY TREES PK 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Carolyn Rovner vs Trish O'Connor / Connie Wong-Younger6-3, 6-3
2021-06-13vs PLEASANTON 18AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesRattana Graff / Margaret Harrison vs Jade Deguzman / Lourdes Alano6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Margaret Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Heather Houston
published 4
3.39
Pia Moore
published
3.37
Shelley Lober
published
3.34
Rattana Graff
published
3.31
Jill Pfeiffer
published
3.23
Carolyn Rovner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Leda Lim
published
3.21
Lea McSweeney
published
3.16
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.12
Jen Juroff
published
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
2.88
Gayle Millington
published 3
2.79
Karen Schumann
published
Paula Bellas
published
Susan Tricca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lea McSweeney + Debbie Baker3351% games−1.7% vs expected
Lea McSweeney + Shelley Lober134 matchesnot enough data
Jill Pfeiffer + Dana Kruger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Harrison
325W–140L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Heather Houston
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.69
Pia Moore
67W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
3.39
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
Jill Pfeiffer
44W–42L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Carolyn Rovner
27W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Leda Lim
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Lea McSweeney
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
Jen Juroff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Gayle Millington
5W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
Karen Schumann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
2.79
Paula Bellas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Tricca
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.