Teams

UPTA18FF/Zeimetz/Pavilion

2026 UPTA Fall 18 & over-Women · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA18FF/HallidayHucks/Butler Springs000000
2UPTA18F/Frank/GCC000000
3UPTA18FF/Bradbrook/Pavillion000000
4UPTA18FF/Tomforde/Butler Springs000000
5UPTA18FF/Blum/GCC000000
6UPTA18FF/Moore/Sugar Creek000000
7UPTA18FF/Littleton/Holly Tree000000
8UPTA18FF/Posta/Southside000000
9UPTA18FF/Zeimetz/Pavilion000000
10UPTA18FF/Albers/GCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Abby Warren
published 3
2.94
Sandy Buol
published
2.93
Virginia Brannon
published
2.88
Blair Zeimetz
published 3
2.85
Natalie Ruggiero
published
2.70
Bronwen Greene
published 3
2.66
Sandy Shaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Ruggiero + Abby Warren6264% games+12.8% vs expected
Blair Zeimetz + Sandy Buol5261% games−2.1% vs expected
Blair Zeimetz + Natalie Ruggiero4544% games−3.5% vs expected
Blair Zeimetz + Bronwen Greene123 matchesnot enough data
Bronwen Greene + Sandy Buol303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Abby Warren
31W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sandy Buol
28W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
Virginia Brannon
18W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Blair Zeimetz
46W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Natalie Ruggiero
42W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Bronwen Greene
22W–17L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Sandy Shaw
33W–22L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.