Teams

UPTA18F/Frank/GCC

2026 UPTA Fall 18 & over-Women · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA18FF/HallidayHucks/Butler Springs000000
2UPTA18F/Frank/GCC000000
3UPTA18FF/Bradbrook/Pavillion000000
4UPTA18FF/Tomforde/Butler Springs000000
5UPTA18FF/Blum/GCC000000
6UPTA18FF/Moore/Sugar Creek000000
7UPTA18FF/Littleton/Holly Tree000000
8UPTA18FF/Posta/Southside000000
9UPTA18FF/Zeimetz/Pavilion000000
10UPTA18FF/Albers/GCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Meredith Glenn
published
2.93
Stacy Alexandrou
published
2.91
Laurie Koch
published
2.76
Nina Jackson
published
2.70
Christy Glenn
published 3
2.70
Emily Busby
published 3
2.66
Lauren Barber
published
2.64
Carrie Marguet
published 3
2.63
Jessica Siler
published
2.58
Jannie Darwin
published
2.56
Holly Sellers
published 2.5
2.51
Lora Schipper
published
2.50
Michelle Seaver
published
2.49
Kasey Frank
published
2.45
Sarah DAndrea
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Busby + Laurie Koch3260% games+9.4% vs expected
Holly Sellers + Lauren Barber4355% games+9.0% vs expected
Kasey Frank + Carrie Marguet3347% games−2.9% vs expected
Emily Busby + Carrie Marguet2342% games−7.9% vs expected
Lauren Barber + Jessica Siler5061% gamesnot enough data
Emily Busby + Stacy Alexandrou134 matchesnot enough data
Jannie Darwin + Christy Glenn134 matchesnot enough data
Kasey Frank + Laurie Koch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Glenn
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Stacy Alexandrou
15W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.93
Laurie Koch
20W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Nina Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Christy Glenn
12W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Emily Busby
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Lauren Barber
15W–8L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Carrie Marguet
15W–19L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
2.64
Jessica Siler
21W–19L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jannie Darwin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Holly Sellers
32W–23L career · no lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.56
Lora Schipper
3W–20L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
Michelle Seaver
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Kasey Frank
11W–26L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Sarah DAndrea
10W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.