Teams

CCTA60/Goldenfield/Haven

Fall League 60 & Over - Beaufort Co. · Men's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-04-19vs CCTA60/Rochefort/DatawLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Batelli / Mike Cash vs Scott Hammond / Rob Rochefort1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEric Broersma / Thomas Quartuccio vs Aaron Henderson / Ivo Janecka6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoe ORourke / Paul Timashenka vs Sam Adams / Craig DeWitt3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-01vs CCTA60/Rochefort/DatawLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Scire / Gary Sinclair vs Rob Rochefort / Scott Hammond3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEric Broersma / Paul Timashenka vs Steve Parsons / Scott Sonoc6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPasco Capuano / Joe ORourke vs Robert Lasher / Sam Adams7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Paul Timashenka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Mark Scire
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Robert Batelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Sinclair
published 3.5
3.09
JOHANNES ZACHBAUER
published 3.5
3.08
Doyle Long
published 3
2.89
Joe ORourke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Pasco Capuano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Mark Goldenfield
published
Thomas Quartuccio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Batelli + Mark Scire9653% games+4.9% vs expected
Gary Sinclair + Mark Scire2345% games+3.4% vs expected
Paul Timashenka + Mark Goldenfield1437% games−0.4% vs expected
Paul Timashenka + Joe ORourke1437% gamesnot enough data
Pasco Capuano + Mark Goldenfield213 matchesnot enough data
Paul Timashenka + Doyle Long123 matchesnot enough data
Doyle Long + Joe ORourke033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Timashenka
12W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Mark Scire
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Robert Batelli
21W–16L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Gary Sinclair
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
JOHANNES ZACHBAUER
18W–16L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Doyle Long
7W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.08
Joe ORourke
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Pasco Capuano
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
Mark Goldenfield
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Thomas Quartuccio
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.