Teams

CCTA60/Rochefort/Dataw

Fall League 60 & Over - Beaufort Co. · Men's 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-04-19vs CCTA60/Goldenfield/HavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Hammond / Rob Rochefort vs Robert Batelli / Mike Cash6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAaron Henderson / Ivo Janecka vs Eric Broersma / Thomas Quartuccio4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSam Adams / Craig DeWitt vs Joe ORourke / Paul Timashenka3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-01vs CCTA60/Goldenfield/HavenWon 20
W#1 DoublesRob Rochefort / Scott Hammond vs Mark Scire / Gary Sinclair6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Parsons / Scott Sonoc vs Eric Broersma / Paul Timashenka1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gary Mignogna
published 3.5
3.23
Scott Sonoc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Chuck Schweitzer
published 3.5
2.96
Steve Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Craig DeWitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Dale Kirby
published 3
2.80
Rob Rochefort
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Aaron Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ivo Janecka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Les Vaughan
published
Scott Drury
published
Scott Hammond
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Drury + Dale Kirby3448% games−3.2% vs expected
Rob Rochefort + Scott Hammond224 matchesnot enough data
Dale Kirby + Aaron Henderson134 matchesnot enough data
Chuck Schweitzer + Steve Parsons033 matchesnot enough data
Steve Parsons + Scott Sonoc123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Mignogna
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Sonoc
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Chuck Schweitzer
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Steve Parsons
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Craig DeWitt
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Dale Kirby
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Rob Rochefort
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.80
Aaron Henderson
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Ivo Janecka
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Les Vaughan
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Drury
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Hammond
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.