Teams

NE-REG-Betts

18 & Over .5's Aug. 19-21 · 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE-REG-Betts000000
2HOA-REG-Mekles/18&Over4.5M000000
3IA-REG-Boyer18&Over4.5M000000
4OKWC-Denne000000
5KS-REG-Unrein/18&Over4.5M000000
6HOAWC-REG-Cusick/18&Over4.5M000000
7OK-Reg-Choi000000
8STL-REG-Hartig/Rigby000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Ryan Strasil
published
4.38
Brendan Eglseder
published 4.5
4.36
Matthew Eglseder
published
Chase Petersen
published 4.5
4.20
George Nelson
published 4.5
4.18
Gabriel Pariacote
published 4.5
4.13
Noel Hoig
published
3.94
Ron Betts
published
Michael Saniuk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noel Hoig + Ron Betts5260% games−0.6% vs expected
Ron Betts + George Nelson1448% gamesnot enough data
Brendan Eglseder + Matthew Eglseder314 matchesnot enough data
Gabriel Pariacote + Ron Betts303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Strasil
20W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Brendan Eglseder
31W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
Matthew Eglseder
42W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.36
4.5
Chase Petersen
35W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
George Nelson
34W–44L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Gabriel Pariacote
32W–36L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Noel Hoig
77W–38L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
Ron Betts
61W–34L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
Michael Saniuk
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.