Teams

Net Results

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-30vs Fast and FuriousWon 10
W#3 SinglesChristine Becer vs Felicia Harrison6-4, 6-0
2024-09-25Lost 01
L#2 SinglesChristine Becer vs Michele Davis5-7, 0-6
2024-09-22Won 10
W#3 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Tracie Lanter6-0, 6-0
2024-09-15vs Ball too WellLost 01
L#1 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Margie Davis4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-24Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Becer vs Aisha Bhimla4-6, 0-6
2024-08-18Won 10
W#2 SinglesJenna Gietl vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-21Won 10
W#3 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Michele Davis6-0, 6-4
2024-07-10vs Ball too WellWon 10
W#3 SinglesJenna Gietl vs Katya White6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Hannah Stahl
published
4.41
Lily Kosegarten
published
4.31
Jenna Gietl
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.20
Christine Becer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Helen Shepherd
published
4.17
Rachel Mingus
published
4.09
Clare Donahue
published 4.5
3.65
Ariel Selwyn
published 4
Tara Jakubik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Becer + Jenna Gietl213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Stahl
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.55
Lily Kosegarten
16W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Jenna Gietl
133W–117L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Christine Becer
270W–177L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
Helen Shepherd
26W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Rachel Mingus
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Clare Donahue
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Ariel Selwyn
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Tara Jakubik
36W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.