Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Matkin

2024 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesAshley Matkin / Mariell Tomasovich vs Kathy Rogers / Peggy Trott6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSally Sterling / Thelma Sahara vs Monica McCready / Kathy Rogers7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNadine Kim / Judy Theriault vs Susan Caruso / Patricia Baughman6-4, 6-4
2024-05-10vs CV-La Quinta Resort/Lisa MorganSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSally Sterling / Lorna Matthew vs Lisa Morgan / Cynthia Reyes2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Fox / Nadine Kim vs Diane Crystal / Leslie Ransdall6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThelma Sahara / Ashley Matkin vs Julie Exley / Monica McCready6-3, 6-2
2024-04-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesLesley Gagnon / Nadine Kim vs Jill Thompson / Leah Stratton6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kim Kouwabunpat
published
4.32
Shannon Schuld-Gray
published
4.12
Sally Sterling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.09
Maria Crema
published
4.02
Carole Myser
published 4.5
3.77
Gianna Riley
published
3.73
Thelma Sahara
published
3.70
Doreen Buchy
published
3.65
Ashley Matkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Lorna Matthew
published
3.43
Judy Theriault
published
3.35
Nadine Kim
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.28
Lesley Gagnon
published
3.22
Lori Tanking
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nadine Kim + Lesley Gagnon13457% games−6.4% vs expected
Sally Sterling + Ashley Matkin3244% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Kouwabunpat
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
Shannon Schuld-Gray
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
4.32
4
Sally Sterling
125W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
4.12
Maria Crema
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Carole Myser
32W–33L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Gianna Riley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Thelma Sahara
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Doreen Buchy
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Ashley Matkin
91W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Lorna Matthew
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Judy Theriault
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Nadine Kim
90W–96L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Lesley Gagnon
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Lori Tanking
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.