Teams

LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/Wright & Reddick-Cooley

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesAnnie Ottesen / Stella Snethlage vs Mei Leckenby / Monica Solis2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Young / Molly Hilll vs Leda Potente / Roberta Stone6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJill Day / Molly Hilll vs Lori Kilburn / Sherri Nickerson6-2, 6-3
2023-02-19vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Wright / Molly Hilll vs Christine Zika / Jayne Raeburn6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAnnie Ottesen vs Jessica Inserra1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Hilll / Stella Snethlage vs Catherine Petitti / Jeanie Alhadeff6-4, 6-1
2023-01-08vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnnie Ottesen / Lorri Miller vs Christine Zika / Susan Waugh2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Hilary Quinn
published 3.5
3.46
Jill Wright
published
3.41
Molly Hilll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Heather Black
published 3.5
3.22
Suzanne Young
published
3.17
2.85
Lorri Miller
published
2.57
Annie Ottesen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Katherine Binder
published
Maggie Maita
published
Stella Snethlage
published
Susan Thronson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Black + Hilary Quinn15556% games+10.3% vs expected
Jill Wright + Hilary Quinn4156% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Reddick-Cooley + Hilary Quinn134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hilary Quinn
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jill Wright
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Molly Hilll
66W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Heather Black
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
Suzanne Young
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elaine Reddick-Cooley
25W–24L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
Lorri Miller
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Annie Ottesen
33W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
Katherine Binder
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maggie Maita
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stella Snethlage
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Thronson
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.