Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Nickerson & Charron

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesCamille Elliott / Sherri Nickerson vs Maggie Maita / Susan Thronson7-5, 6-4
2023-03-05vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Charron / Sherri Nickerson vs Margaret Middleton / Jan Ferrell6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMei Leckenby / Janice Malos vs Beverly Cramer / Dawn Hubbard6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Charron vs Suzanne Young6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMei Leckenby / Camille Elliott vs Hilary Quinn / Heather Black2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Charron / Mei Leckenby vs Christina Cooley / Katherine Misskelley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCamille Elliott / Carmen Nokes vs Lindy Gaylord / Catherine Petitti6-4, 7-5
2023-02-12vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriWon 10
W#3 DoublesCamille Elliott / Lori Kilburn vs Jan Ferrell / Susan Waugh6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCamille Elliott / Sherri Nickerson vs Suzanne Young / Lorri Miller6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMei Leckenby / Janice Malos vs Jessica Inserra / Catherine Petitti6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Charron vs Christina Cooley6-4, 7-6
2023-01-22vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSherri Nickerson / Jennifer Charron vs Christine Zika / Marde Olson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMei Leckenby / Janice Malos vs Margaret Middleton / Jan Ferrell6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Jennifer Bouffard
published
3.28
Jennifer Charron
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Camille Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Lori Kilburn
published
3.00
Joann Bailin
published
2.97
Janice Malos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Mei Leckenby
published
Monica Solis
published
Nicole Popper
published
Patty Booth
published
Sherri Nickerson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Bouffard
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Jennifer Charron
92W–104L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Lori Kilburn
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Joann Bailin
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Heather Jones-Gochis
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Janice Malos
29W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mei Leckenby
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monica Solis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Popper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Booth
17W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.