Teams

TOC.Thio

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 65 & Over · Combo 65 & Over 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs TOC.PowellLost 03
L#1 DoublesIlona Peszlen / Alison Whatley vs Dell Pinkston / Nancy Draughon4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesHanna Sturgis / Karon Mertens vs Sue Hackney / Susana Harvey1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJessie Brinkley / Pamela Hobson vs Donna Lee / Virginia Lewis6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-08-20vs TOC.PowellWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarole Bobby / Hanna Sturgis vs Deb Lanier / Dell Pinkston6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGauri Johnson / Maria Hernandez vs Debbie Powell / Sue Hackney5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKati Ray / Victoria Thio vs Donna Lee / Betsy Terjesen6-1, 7-6
2026-08-13vs TOC.PowellLost 03
L#1 DoublesIlona Peszlen / Terry Friddle vs Deb Lanier / Dell Pinkston2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaron Mertens / Hanna Sturgis vs Debbie Powell / Jo Ann Novak2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGauri Johnson / Maria Hernandez vs Makereta Fitzcharles / Donna Lee1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Combo 65 & Over 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Powell1142554
2TOC.Thio1124968

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Carole Bobby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Ilona Peszlen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kathy Plattner
published
3.19
Jessie Brinkley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Victoria Thio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Karon Mertens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Gauri Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Hanna Sturgis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Kati Ray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Pamela Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Alison Whatley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Cecilia Edgar
published 3
2.70
Terry Friddle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carole Bobby + Ilona Peszlen151450% games−2.6% vs expected
Cecilia Edgar + Victoria Thio6454% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Thio + Alison Whatley1945% gamesnot enough data
Hanna Sturgis + Kati Ray6256% gamesnot enough data
Kati Ray + Alison Whatley0634% gamesnot enough data
Karon Mertens + Hanna Sturgis2347% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Edgar + Kati Ray123 matchesnot enough data
Cecilia Edgar + Alison Whatley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carole Bobby
186W–190L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Ilona Peszlen
89W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kathy Plattner
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jessie Brinkley
120W–101L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Victoria Thio
95W–101L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Karon Mertens
122W–103L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Gauri Johnson
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Hanna Sturgis
81W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Kati Ray
76W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Pamela Hobson
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Alison Whatley
39W–72L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Cecilia Edgar
284W–255L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Terry Friddle
164W–164L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.