Teams

TOC.Powell

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 65 & Over · Combo 65 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs TOC.ThioWon 30
W#1 DoublesDell Pinkston / Nancy Draughon vs Ilona Peszlen / Alison Whatley6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSue Hackney / Susana Harvey vs Hanna Sturgis / Karon Mertens6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Lee / Virginia Lewis vs Jessie Brinkley / Pamela Hobson3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-08-20vs TOC.ThioLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Dell Pinkston vs Carole Bobby / Hanna Sturgis7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Powell / Sue Hackney vs Gauri Johnson / Maria Hernandez7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Lee / Betsy Terjesen vs Kati Ray / Victoria Thio1-6, 6-7
2026-08-13vs TOC.ThioWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeb Lanier / Dell Pinkston vs Ilona Peszlen / Terry Friddle6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Powell / Jo Ann Novak vs Karon Mertens / Hanna Sturgis6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMakereta Fitzcharles / Donna Lee vs Gauri Johnson / Maria Hernandez6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Combo 65 & Over 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Powell1142554
2TOC.Thio1124968

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Deb Lanier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Debbie Powell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Nancy Draughon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Virginia Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Makereta Fitzcharles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Dell Pinkston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Sue Hackney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Jo Ann Novak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Betsy Terjesen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Lanier + Susana Harvey27668% games+3.0% vs expected
Nancy Draughon + Susana Harvey551264% games+2.5% vs expected
Debbie Powell + Deb Lanier14266% games−0.4% vs expected
Makereta Fitzcharles + Sue Hackney6157% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Draughon + Deb Lanier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.77
3.5
Deb Lanier
488W–223L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Debbie Powell
39W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Nancy Draughon
210W–73L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Virginia Lewis
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Makereta Fitzcharles
48W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3
Dell Pinkston
94W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Sue Hackney
81W–46L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Jo Ann Novak
138W–121L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Betsy Terjesen
145W–85L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.