Teams

Dumb Aces

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-09vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Ferney / Cathy Cooper vs Laura Kiracofe / Carol Wingate2-6, 1-6
2023-06-20vs Slice GirlsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudy DeBoer / Stephanie Ferney vs Diana Linderman / Amy Pugsley1-6, 0-6
2023-06-15vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Ferney / Cathy Cooper vs Brookelyn Carpenter / Carol Wingate4-6, 2-6
2023-06-01vs Good GetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Holmes / Stephanie Ferney vs Bea Gogate / Cynthia Melillo0-6, 1-6
2023-05-23vs Good GetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Bowden / Stephanie Ferney vs Bea Gogate / Boz Kalange6-4, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dumb Aces54141329237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Colleen Trese
published 3
Angela Hill
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 2.5
2.00
Michele Bowden
published 2.5
Judy DeBoer
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Sandra Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Stephanie Ferney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tundra McDougal
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy DeBoer + Angela Hill61438% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Holmes + Michele Bowden41232% gamesnot enough data
Judy DeBoer + Sandra Holmes11333% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Holmes + Colleen Trese21234% gamesnot enough data
Judy DeBoer + Michele Bowden21034% gamesnot enough data
Michele Bowden + Angela Hill0826% gamesnot enough data
Colleen Trese + Angela Hill044 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Trese + Tundra McDougal224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Colleen Trese
71W–123L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
2.65
2.5
Angela Hill
26W–83L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Michele Bowden
51W–106L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Judy DeBoer
36W–130L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Holmes
17W–107L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Ferney
1W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tundra McDougal
50W–77L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.