Teams

Slice Girls

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 2.69 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-27vs Good GetsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Schneider vs Adys Alvarez6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSamantha Tyree / Angela Little vs Boz Kalange / Bea Gogate6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-22vs Good GetsWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsay Diggs vs ANDREA STUART6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSamantha Tyree / Ruth Adler vs Cynthia Melillo / Adys Alvarez6-1, 6-1
2023-06-20vs Dumb AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSamantha Tyree / Lindsay Diggs vs Colleen Trese / Michele Bowden4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Linderman / Amy Pugsley vs Judy DeBoer / Stephanie Ferney6-1, 6-0
2023-06-15vs Good GetsWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Schneider / Amy Pugsley vs Paige Gutierrez / Adys Alvarez6-1, 6-3
2023-06-13vs Backhanded ComplimentsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLindsay Diggs / Martine Castoro vs Cassie Horner / Brookelyn Carpenter4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Tyree / Kristina Winterling vs Rachel Pyron / Laura Kiracofe6-4, 6-4
2023-06-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAngela Little / Elizabeth Schneider vs Jennifer Boyd / Cathy Cooper6-7, 2-6
2023-06-01vs Backhanded ComplimentsWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Carlise / Martine Castoro vs Laura Kiracofe / Brookelyn Carpenter6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-30vs Dumb AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Tyree / Laura Barton vs Jennifer Boyd / Michele Bowden7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Linderman / Amy Pugsley vs Sandra Holmes / Judy DeBoer6-7, 3-6
2023-05-23vs Backhanded ComplimentsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRuth Adler / Amy Pugsley vs Brookelyn Carpenter / Laura Kiracofe6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCristina Daccarett / Elizabeth Schneider vs Rachel Pyron / Carol Wingate6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
3.08
Amy Pugsley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Ruth Adler
published 3
2.61
Angela Little
published 2.5
2.51
Cristina Daccarett
published 2.5
2.50
Elizabeth Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.39
Diana Linderman
published 2.5
2.12
Martine Castoro
published 2.5
Laura Barton
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Lindsay Diggs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Natalie Carlise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Tyree
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Linderman + Ruth Adler3544% games+12.4% vs expected
Diana Linderman + Elizabeth Schneider6554% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Elizabeth Schneider2641% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Amy Pugsley3547% gamesnot enough data
Diana Linderman + Amy Pugsley2548% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Martine Castoro2541% gamesnot enough data
Martine Castoro + Elizabeth Schneider2434% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Schneider + Angela Little0638% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kristina Winterling
113W–77L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Amy Pugsley
82W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Ruth Adler
70W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
2.5
Angela Little
21W–20L career · no lines in 2023
0%21%79%
2.61
2.5
Cristina Daccarett
28W–28L career · no lines in 2023
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Elizabeth Schneider
24W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Diana Linderman
38W–50L career · no lines in 2023
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Martine Castoro
15W–54L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laura Barton
19W–13L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsay Diggs
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Natalie Carlise
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Samantha Tyree
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.