Teams

Ne.Day18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-14vs El.Hodges18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesNena Marks vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-30vs El.Hodges18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesPaulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs MaryBeth Jackson5-7, 2-6
2024-06-23Lost 01
L#3 SinglesPaulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade vs Laura Alvarez6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-16vs El.Hodges18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesNena Marks vs MaryBeth Jackson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Jennifer Hiller
published
4.87
Nena Marks
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.60
Jamie Breunig
published
4.54
Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.51
Ivette Duran
published
4.26
MacY Fisher
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hiller
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.93
5
Nena Marks
89W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.87
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade
62W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
4.54
Ivette Duran
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.51
MacY Fisher
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.