Teams

Er.Conigliaro40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-06vs Da.Weiland40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeme Avent / Courtney Whalen vs Dana Weiland / Kathryn Beth Beam6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Paula Westregard Bjorklund7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Kana Brinckerhoff vs Yuliya Barthes / Andrea Pfeiffer6-0, 6-1
2024-04-29vs Al.Crumpler40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Courtney Whalen vs Kristi Koren / Amy Pena4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Ginny Meier6-7, 0-4
L#2 DoublesGwynn Thayer / Jacqueline Ritchey vs Laura Capps / Jackie Caprio2-6, 4-6
2024-04-23vs Da.Weiland40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeme Avent / Courtney Whalen vs Dana Weiland / Jennifer Bricker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Yuliya Barthes6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Gwynn Thayer vs Leigh Kimball / Cynthia Smith4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Kim McDonald vs Stephanie Rabby / Kathryn Beth Beam6-0, 6-3
2024-04-22vs Ka.Conley40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Andra Kinlaw vs Karen Conley / Jean Harrold6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Jacqueline Ritchey vs Lynda McDonell / Kellie Chesson6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNikki DAmbrose / Kim McDonald vs Barbara Callahan / Deb Lanier6-1, 6-1
2024-04-15vs Ch.Watson40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Gwynn Thayer vs Helen Williams / Hilary Kuss0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Jeme Avent vs Nicole Rahm / Hallie Shinn4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Ritchey / Marylou Krasnick vs Christine Watson / Roni Bonello1-6, 6-7
2024-03-18vs Al.Crumpler40ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Courtney Whalen vs Ginny Meier / Kristi Koren5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Sharon Baggett6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Talton / Andra Kinlaw vs Erin Swindell / Amy Pena5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Michele Adams vs Allison Crumpler / LeAnne Bloedon7-6, 6-3
2024-03-11vs Ka.Conley40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Nikki DAmbrose vs Karen Conley / Jean Harrold7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Andra Kinlaw vs Beth Johnson / Lynda McDonell7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Talton / Michele Adams vs Christy Team / Kellie Chesson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-04vs Ch.Watson40ALost 04
L#1 DoublesKana Brinckerhoff / Jeme Avent vs Nicole Rahm / Hallie Shinn6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNikki DAmbrose vs Jenny Doyle1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Whalen / Lisa Talton vs Christine Watson / Roni Bonello3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Jayne Burton vs Jenny Coley / Helen Williams4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Kana Brinckerhoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.81
Jeme Avent
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Nikki DAmbrose
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.71
Erin Conigliaro
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
Andra Kinlaw
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Lisa Talton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Jacqueline Ritchey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Marylou Krasnick
published
3.40
Gwynn Thayer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kana Brinckerhoff + Jeme Avent181154% games+3.5% vs expected
Kana Brinckerhoff + Erin Conigliaro6354% games+0.2% vs expected
Lisa Talton + Nikki DAmbrose2541% gamesnot enough data
Andra Kinlaw + Kana Brinckerhoff5154% gamesnot enough data
Andra Kinlaw + Erin Conigliaro4252% gamesnot enough data
Kana Brinckerhoff + Nikki DAmbrose5156% gamesnot enough data
Kana Brinckerhoff + Gwynn Thayer3257% gamesnot enough data
Erin Conigliaro + Jeme Avent224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kana Brinckerhoff
238W–110L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Jeme Avent
297W–148L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Nikki DAmbrose
311W–268L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Erin Conigliaro
175W–128L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Andra Kinlaw
119W–63L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Lisa Talton
120W–112L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Jacqueline Ritchey
43W–58L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Marylou Krasnick
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.44
4
Gwynn Thayer
135W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.