Teams

MRider

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-09vs JPhillips Fall 3.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Jessica Phillips6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Kari Barsness6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Jennifer Brock6-3, 6-2
2022-09-29vs EUhlandWon 20
W#1 SinglesJamie Middledorf vs Maggie Patterson6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Maggie LaPlante6-3, 6-1
2022-09-22vs JMcIntyreSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJamie Middledorf vs Ginny Meier3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Kimberly Durland6-4, 7-6
2022-09-15vs JPhillips Fall 3.5 SinglesWon 30
W#1 SinglesJamie Middledorf vs Heather Tuttle6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Melissa Hill6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Jennifer Brock6-1, 6-0
2022-09-08vs EUhlandWon 30
W#1 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Danielle Stringer6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Jill David6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMarcy Points vs Emily Uhland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs JMcIntyreSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Holly Camak6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMarcy Points vs Jessica McIntyre1-6, 3-6
2022-08-25Split 11
L#1 SinglesNancy Pack vs Jessica Phillips3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Melissa Hill6-2, 6-1
2022-08-18vs EUhlandWon 30
W#1 SinglesJamie Middledorf vs Maggie LaPlante6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNancy Pack vs Maggie Patterson6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Jeanette Gerould6-1, 6-3
2022-08-11vs JMcIntyreWon 21
L#1 SinglesJamie Middledorf vs Kimberly Durland1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Dana Aderhold6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMarcy Points vs Luann Richardson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Nancy Pack
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.77
Jamie Middledorf
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Meghan Rider
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.46
Marcy Points
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Allyson Schneider
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Pack + Meghan Rider6260% gamesnot enough data
Allyson Schneider + Jamie Middledorf134 matchesnot enough data
Allyson Schneider + Meghan Rider303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nancy Pack
296W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Jamie Middledorf
140W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Meghan Rider
342W–169L career · 5 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Marcy Points
147W–104L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Allyson Schneider
292W–173L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.