Teams

EUhland

2022 Capital Fall 18 & Over Singles League · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-10-06vs JMcIntyreSplit 11
L#2 SinglesEmily Uhland vs Ginny Meier2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJeanette Gerould vs Luann Richardson7-5, 7-5
2022-09-29vs MRiderLost 02
L#2 SinglesMaggie LaPlante vs Nancy Pack3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Uhland vs Laura Ross3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-22vs JPhillips Fall 3.5 SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEmily Uhland vs Jessica Phillips3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMaggie LaPlante vs Betsy Fulcher6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-15vs JMcIntyreWon 10
W#3 SinglesEmily Uhland vs Dana Aderhold6-2, 6-3
2022-09-08vs MRiderLost 01
L#3 SinglesEmily Uhland vs Marcy Points6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesJeanette Gerould vs Melissa Hill6-2, 6-1
2022-08-25vs JMcIntyreWon 20
W#2 SinglesJeanette Gerould vs Teressa Paschaloudis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMaggie LaPlante vs Ann Garey6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-18vs MRiderLost 02
L#1 SinglesMaggie LaPlante vs Jamie Middledorf1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJeanette Gerould vs Meghan Rider1-6, 3-6
2022-08-11vs JPhillips Fall 3.5 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesJeanette Gerould vs Jessica Phillips6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMaggie LaPlante vs Kari Barsness1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Emily Uhland
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.56
Maggie Patterson
published
3.55
Jamie Martin
published 4
3.35
Maggie LaPlante
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Danielle Stringer
published 3.5
3.14
Jill David
published
3.05
Jeanette Gerould
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie LaPlante + Emily Uhland5553% gamesnot enough data
Maggie LaPlante + Jeanette Gerould2338% gamesnot enough data
Maggie LaPlante + Danielle Stringer033 matchesnot enough data
Emily Uhland + Maggie Patterson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Uhland
87W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
Maggie Patterson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Jamie Martin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Maggie LaPlante
95W–120L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Danielle Stringer
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Jill David
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Jeanette Gerould
69W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.