Teams

Sports Mall-Johnson/Scharman

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W AM

15 players · average NTRP 4.07 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-03vs Eagleridge-OlsenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Roberts / Susanne Mcdonald vs Jessica Olsen / Debby Richards6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoanna Heiden / Kandice Taylor vs Rosemary Glines / Nancy Skidmore4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-05-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoanna Heiden / Susanne Mcdonald vs Alex Gempeler / Teisa Linscott6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2021-05-13vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Daw / Joanna Heiden vs Deborah Rentfrow / Sherree Greenhalgh7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJoanna Heiden / Tiffany Renfro vs Belinda Jensen / Andrea Smith0-6, 4-6
2021-04-22vs Ivory Ridge-LangstonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusanne Mcdonald / Kandice Taylor vs Jen Langston / Heather Allen1-6, 5-7
2021-04-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Roberts / Susanne Mcdonald vs Merri Gillespie / Holli Turner3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Karin Smith
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
4.18
Marissa Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Kandice Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.83
Crystel Fox
usually #2 Singles 54%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 4
3.77
Robyn Scharman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
Heidi Maxfield
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Regina Johnson
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.61
Joanna Heiden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Sarah Love
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Pamela Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.24
Julie Labrum
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Tiffany Renfro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Michelle Kemp
published
Sarah Daw
published
Susanne Mcdonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Maxfield + Marissa Jackson11557% games+15.5% vs expected
Julie Labrum + Robyn Scharman7358% games+8.5% vs expected
Robyn Scharman + Regina Johnson16756% games+6.1% vs expected
Regina Johnson + Marissa Jackson19457% games+5.3% vs expected
Robyn Scharman + Kandice Taylor9257% games+4.6% vs expected
Sarah Love + Heidi Maxfield28961% games+3.0% vs expected
Robyn Scharman + Pamela Roberts7358% games+2.8% vs expected
Joanna Heiden + Pamela Roberts12655% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karin Smith
143W–70L career · 14 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Marissa Jackson
110W–41L career · 6 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Kandice Taylor
152W–168L career · 15 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
4.00
4
Crystel Fox
151W–135L career · 13 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Heidi Maxfield
127W–86L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Regina Johnson
122W–100L career · 8 lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Joanna Heiden
93W–99L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
Sarah Love
200W–135L career · 11 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Pamela Roberts
97W–46L career · 7 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
Julie Labrum
98W–95L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Tiffany Renfro
119W–133L career · 6 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Michelle Kemp
24W–33L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Daw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susanne Mcdonald
32W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.