Teams

Li.Murdock18S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-10-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-21vs Ta.Parise18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Cheryl Reid4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-13vs Er.McAllister18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Molly Walker6-3, 6-3
2025-10-09Won 10
W#2 SinglesMallory Biringer vs Emily Johnson6-2, 6-2
2025-09-30Won 10
W#3 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-23vs Ki.Patrey18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Allison Graves6-4, 6-1
2025-09-22vs Er.McAllister18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Amber Richardson6-2, 6-2
2025-09-15vs El.Hamilton18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMallory Biringer vs Megan Bradley7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-26vs Er.McAllister18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Nikki DAmbrose6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Rachel Matthews6-3, 6-3
2025-08-26vs Em.Cutts18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMallory Biringer vs Skylar Poole7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Stephanie Ferrell6-2, 6-0
2025-08-21vs Ki.Patrey18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Suyeon Kim5-7, 2-6
2025-08-18vs El.Hamilton18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Emily Johnson6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Christine Hughes6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Mary Clare Rosemeyer
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
4.05
Sapna Varkey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
4.05
Lindsay Murdock
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
4.03
Mallory Biringer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.92
Erin Farleigh
published 4
3.64
3.58
Anna Kooper
published 3.5
3.51
Naomi Rodrigues
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Farleigh + Mary Clare Rosemeyer2345% games−4.3% vs expected
Erin Farleigh + Lindsay Murdock134 matchesnot enough data
Sapna Varkey + Lindsay Murdock314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Clare Rosemeyer
123W–43L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Sapna Varkey
81W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Lindsay Murdock
150W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Mallory Biringer
105W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Caroline Yu
27W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Erin Farleigh
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Mariana Lima Gonzalez
129W–73L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Anna Kooper
27W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Naomi Rodrigues
40W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.