Teams

Ta.Parise18S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.43 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-27vs Ki.Patrey18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesDanielle Wilder vs Constanza Gomez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-27vs Ki.Patrey18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesTanya Parise vs Allison Graves0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-21vs Li.Murdock18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesShelly Kirkpatrick vs Chunyan Xie0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Erin Farleigh3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-30vs Li.Murdock18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Nicole Shifflett6-1, 6-1
2025-09-16vs Ki.Patrey18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMaureen Sredl vs Suyeon Kim4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesTanya Parise vs Meghan Griffin6-0, 6-1
2025-09-10vs Li.Murdock18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesShelly Kirkpatrick vs Chunyan Xie6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTanya Parise vs Sunny Orr3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Ki.Patrey18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesShelly Kirkpatrick vs Neeta Vora2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRamona Holdstock vs Constanza Gomez0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesButton Hall vs Madeline Finley3-6, 1-6
2025-08-20vs Li.Murdock18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDanielle Wilder vs Zoe Dubrow6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesButton Hall vs Brooke Melott1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Danielle Wilder
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.37
Tanya Parise
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Shelly Kirkpatrick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Cheryl Reid
published 4.5
4.09
Ramona Holdstock
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Lucy Lewis
published
3.87
Maureen Sredl
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Button Hall
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Wilder + Maureen Sredl31959% games+0.5% vs expected
Shelly Kirkpatrick + Maureen Sredl3253% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Parise + Shelly Kirkpatrick314 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Wilder + Tanya Parise123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Danielle Wilder
229W–112L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Tanya Parise
97W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
4.37
4.5
Shelly Kirkpatrick
90W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Cheryl Reid
38W–32L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Ramona Holdstock
149W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
Lucy Lewis
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Maureen Sredl
163W–152L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Button Hall
223W–223L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.