Teams

KTC-Lin

2023 OH OV SUMMER A40&O · 2023 Summer A40&O 4.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-08vs QRRC-HeilmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesWilbur Lin / John Pinard vs Darrin Heinz / Matt Poulos4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJim Minard / Enrico Ferri vs Bradley Tash / Jorge Crespo2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-24vs QRRC-HeilmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesGopal Bhat / Mitchell McAlpin vs Richard Heilman / Matt Poulos3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Scherquist vs Bradley Tash2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristopher Butler / John Pinard vs Kevin Burr / Aaron Wolters6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-17vs QRRC-HeilmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilbur Lin / Jim Minard vs Kevin Burr / Richard Heilman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Pinard / Mitchell McAlpin vs Jorge Crespo / Chris Joseph7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-10vs QRRC-HeilmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Bosse / Jonathan Scherquist vs Kevin Burr / Matt Poulos4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesWilbur Lin vs Bradley Tash6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGopal Bhat / John Pinard vs Fernando Cubas / Richard Heilman4-6, 6-7
2023-05-20vs QRRC-HeilmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilbur Lin / James Bosse vs Chris Joseph / Matt Poulos3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMatt Critchfield vs Richard Heilman6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJonathan Scherquist / Christopher Butler vs Kevin Burr / Greg Toman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2023 Summer A40&O 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC-Heilman5113513121
2KTC-Lin1551329197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Wilbur Lin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Christopher Butler
published 4.5
James Bosse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Matt Critchfield
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.11
Jonathan Scherquist
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.10
Enrico Ferri
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Gopal Bhat
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jim Minard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Pinard
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mitchell McAlpin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gopal Bhat + Enrico Ferri10952% games+2.8% vs expected
Wilbur Lin + Jonathan Scherquist2445% games−8.9% vs expected
John Pinard + Matt Critchfield2445% gamesnot enough data
Jim Minard + Gopal Bhat4259% gamesnot enough data
Wilbur Lin + Matt Critchfield3350% gamesnot enough data
John Pinard + Wilbur Lin2343% gamesnot enough data
Matt Critchfield + Jonathan Scherquist2351% gamesnot enough data
John Pinard + James Bosse404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wilbur Lin
55W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Christopher Butler
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
James Bosse
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Critchfield
64W–62L career · 1 line in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.17
Jonathan Scherquist
42W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Enrico Ferri
143W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4
Gopal Bhat
130W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jim Minard
51W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Pinard
43W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mitchell McAlpin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.