Teams

QRRC-Heilman

2023 OH OV SUMMER A40&O · 2023 Summer A40&O 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-08vs KTC-LinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDarrin Heinz / Matt Poulos vs Wilbur Lin / John Pinard6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBradley Tash / Jorge Crespo vs Jim Minard / Enrico Ferri6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-24vs KTC-LinWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Heilman / Matt Poulos vs Gopal Bhat / Mitchell McAlpin6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBradley Tash vs Jonathan Scherquist6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKevin Burr / Aaron Wolters vs Christopher Butler / John Pinard2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-17vs KTC-LinWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Burr / Richard Heilman vs Wilbur Lin / Jim Minard6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesFernando Cubas vs Christopher Butler6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJorge Crespo / Chris Joseph vs John Pinard / Mitchell McAlpin6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-10vs KTC-LinWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Burr / Matt Poulos vs James Bosse / Jonathan Scherquist6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesBradley Tash vs Wilbur Lin3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesFernando Cubas / Richard Heilman vs Gopal Bhat / John Pinard6-4, 7-6
2023-05-20vs KTC-LinLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Joseph / Matt Poulos vs Wilbur Lin / James Bosse6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRichard Heilman vs Matt Critchfield2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Burr / Greg Toman vs Jonathan Scherquist / Christopher Butler3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2023 Summer A40&O 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC-Heilman5113513121
2KTC-Lin1551329197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Matt Poulos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.43
Darrin Heinz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Chris Joseph
published 4.5
4.22
Kevin Burr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Bradley Tash
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Jonathan Peters
published
3.83
Aaron Wolters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Greg Toman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Fernando Cubas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.73
Jorge Crespo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Heilman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Burr + Richard Heilman5066% games+9.6% vs expected
Kevin Burr + Aaron Wolters8064% games+6.3% vs expected
Jorge Crespo + Richard Heilman2541% games−6.8% vs expected
Greg Toman + Aaron Wolters5165% gamesnot enough data
Bradley Tash + Jorge Crespo314 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Burr + Darrin Heinz404 matchesnot enough data
Fernando Cubas + Aaron Wolters404 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Burr + Chris Joseph213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Poulos
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
4.66
4.5
Darrin Heinz
77W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Chris Joseph
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Burr
105W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Bradley Tash
33W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
Jonathan Peters
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Aaron Wolters
113W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Greg Toman
130W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Fernando Cubas
30W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jorge Crespo
53W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Richard Heilman
58W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.