Teams

ROUND HILL CC 18AW3.5B

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Laura Dommes
published
3.37
Kara Chizever
published
3.36
Michelle Bauer
published
3.36
3.33
Shawn Young
published
3.32
Allene Rognon
published 3.5
3.30
Cecily Barclay
published 3.5
3.26
Suzanne Peck
published
3.25
Heather Paquette
published
3.21
Nanny Tunnell
published
3.19
Sarah Shapiro
published
3.19
Christine Reiners
published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Loughmiller
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
published
3.13
Mihaela Farnholtz
published
Erica Dublin
published
Jana Vojdani
published
Julie Peloquin
published
Lise Sage
published
Margaret Simor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Young + Trish Nornhold224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Paquette + Christine Reiners134 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Loughmiller + Kara Chizever123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Paquette + Suzanne Peck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Dommes
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Kara Chizever
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Michelle Bauer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Allene Rognon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cecily Barclay
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Suzanne Peck
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Heather Paquette
20W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Nanny Tunnell
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Sarah Shapiro
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Christine Reiners
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Kristen Loughmiller
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Trish Nornhold
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
Mihaela Farnholtz
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
Erica Dublin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jana Vojdani
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Peloquin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lise Sage
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Simor
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.