Teams

ETA RED

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-16vs LTA BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKoleen Schriever / Shelly Donahue vs Sandy Wheaton / Jan DeBruin6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlexina Campbell / Carolyn Prior vs TOMOKO WATANABE / Susanna Bolton1-6, 2-6
2024-08-02vs HMTC TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesKoleen Schriever / Gail Sullivan vs Marcee Gustafson / Linda Berkheim3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGlenna Cook / Alexina Campbell vs Donna Taub / Jane Koepp2-6, 3-6
2024-07-26vs CSU WHITEWon 10
W#1 DoublesShelly Donahue / Koleen Schriever vs Kathi Freemann / Betty Gonzales7-5, 6-4
2024-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlexina Campbell / Koleen Schriever vs Bernice Boyer / Leslie Walker7-5, 6-1
2024-06-28vs HMTC TEALLost 01
L#2 DoublesKoleen Schriever / Cheryl Clausen vs Ingrid Parsons / Mary Gabiola6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Koleen Schriever
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Diane Holmberg
published 2.5
2.15
Alexina Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Cheryl Clausen
published 2.5
Gail Sullivan
published
Glenna Cook
published
Shelly Donahue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glenna Cook + Alexina Campbell0724% gamesnot enough data
Glenna Cook + Koleen Schriever0534% gamesnot enough data
Alexina Campbell + Koleen Schriever1430% gamesnot enough data
Gail Sullivan + Alexina Campbell044 matchesnot enough data
Gail Sullivan + Cheryl Clausen044 matchesnot enough data
Koleen Schriever + Shelly Donahue134 matchesnot enough data
Glenna Cook + Gail Sullivan033 matchesnot enough data
Glenna Cook + Shelly Donahue123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Koleen Schriever
6W–36L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40
2.5
Diane Holmberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Alexina Campbell
2W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Cheryl Clausen
0W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Gail Sullivan
0W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Glenna Cook
1W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelly Donahue
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.