Teams

CSU WHITE

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-05vs LTA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesBetty Gonzales / Nancy Pajak vs Patty Orban / TOMOKO WATANABE6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Hiller / Sue Schneider vs Sandy Wheaton / Kathleen Stevens4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Prudhomme / Judy Stout vs Kathleen Sargent / Jan DeBruin2-6, 4-6
2024-08-02vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Pajak / Sue Schneider vs Deborah Lockwood / Cathy Simocko-Smith2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKatherine Prudhomme / Judy Stout vs Bernita Sterling / Marcia Stauter3-6, 1-6
2024-07-26vs ETA REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Hiller / Nancy Pajak vs Diane Holmberg / Gail Sullivan6-1, 6-1
2024-07-19vs LTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Pajak / Carol Hiller vs Kathleen Sargent / Kathleen Stevens6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatherine Prudhomme / Judy Stout vs Marsha Hansard / Larissa Ebert7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSherri Wera / Kathi Freemann vs Patty Orban / Mary Ellen O'Rell6-0, 7-5
2024-07-12vs HMTC TEALWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarol Hiller / Katherine Prudhomme vs Jane Koepp / Marne Engelking6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSherri Wera / Judy Stout vs Ingrid Parsons / Donna Taub7-5, 6-3
2024-06-28vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarol Hiller / Kathi Freemann vs Marcia Stauter / Bernita Sterling7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSherri Wera / Judy Stout vs Deborah Lockwood / Cathy Simocko-Smith6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Nancy Pajak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Betty Gonzales
published 3
2.74
Carol Hiller
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Sue Schneider
published
2.55
Sherri Wera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3
Kathi Freemann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Pajak + Carol Hiller5262% gamesnot enough data
Carol Hiller + Sue Schneider224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Nancy Pajak
56W–74L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Betty Gonzales
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Carol Hiller
74W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74
Sue Schneider
3W–20L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Sherri Wera
20W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 9 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.40
Kathi Freemann
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.