Teams

Netchix

2026 18&Over Women · 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-20vs Northern: Love Me NotsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMonica Bracken / Amy Jarocki vs Nancy Robitaille / Amy van den Broek6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTing Li vs Cecilia Levy0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Quinn / Ellen Rudel vs Lara MacLachlan / Jessica Hayashi6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-13vs Northern: Love Me NotsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarla Vogel / Amy Jarocki vs Amy van den Broek / Cecilia Levy6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTing Li vs Lauren Recchia1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Roberts / Ann Marie Gilchrist vs Mallory Massry / Nancy Robitaille2-6, 1-6
2026-06-06vs Northern: Love Me NotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Marie Gilchrist / Ting Li vs Amy van den Broek / Cecilia Levy3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Bracken vs Rachel Eager3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Rudel / Shannon Kete vs Mallory Massry / Nancy Robitaille0-6, 2-6
2026-05-30vs Northern: Love Me NotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Roberts / Ann Marie Gilchrist vs Georgia Wohnsen / Amy van den Broek4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Mashaw vs Rachel Eager2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Quinn / Amy Jarocki vs Mallory Massry / Lauren Recchia4-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs Northern: Love Me NotsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTing Li / Jennifer Mashaw vs Mallory Massry / Nancy Robitaille6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMarla Vogel vs Lauren Recchia1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Jarocki / Diane Rehm vs Jessica Hayashi / Stephanie Hiemel6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Northern: Love Me NotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Jarocki / Monica Bracken vs Georgia Wohnsen / Amy van den Broek6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMarla Vogel vs Rachel Eager6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Quinn / Diane Rehm vs Jessica Hayashi / Lara MacLachlan7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-25vs Northern: Love Me NotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Roberts / Amy Jarocki vs Melanie Hawver / Lisa Balboa6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMarla Vogel vs Lauren Recchia2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Rehm / Shannon Kete vs Georgia Wohnsen / Sarah O'higgins6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Brooke Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Amy Jarocki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.28
Marla Vogel
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.19
Diane Rehm
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Monica Bracken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.00
Ting Li
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
1.81
Ann Marie Gilchrist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Ellen Rudel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Mashaw
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Quinn
published
Shannon Kete
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ting Li + Monica Bracken134 matchesnot enough data
Ting Li + Brooke Roberts213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Brooke Roberts
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
2.5
Amy Jarocki
5W–1L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Marla Vogel
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Diane Rehm
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Monica Bracken
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Ting Li
4W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Ann Marie Gilchrist
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Ellen Rudel
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Mashaw
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Quinn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Kete
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.