Teams

Northern: Love Me Nots

2026 18&Over Women · 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-20vs NetchixWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Robitaille / Amy van den Broek vs Monica Bracken / Amy Jarocki4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCecilia Levy vs Ting Li6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLara MacLachlan / Jessica Hayashi vs Nancy Quinn / Ellen Rudel4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-13vs NetchixWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy van den Broek / Cecilia Levy - (DQ) vs Marla Vogel / Amy Jarocki3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Recchia vs Ting Li6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMallory Massry / Nancy Robitaille vs Brooke Roberts / Ann Marie Gilchrist6-2, 6-1
2026-06-06vs NetchixWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy van den Broek / Cecilia Levy - (DQ) vs Ann Marie Gilchrist / Ting Li6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRachel Eager vs Monica Bracken6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMallory Massry / Nancy Robitaille vs Ellen Rudel / Shannon Kete6-0, 6-2
2026-05-30vs NetchixWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeorgia Wohnsen / Amy van den Broek vs Brooke Roberts / Ann Marie Gilchrist6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Eager vs Jennifer Mashaw6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMallory Massry / Lauren Recchia vs Nancy Quinn / Amy Jarocki6-4, 6-2
2026-05-16vs NetchixWon 21
W#1 DoublesMallory Massry / Nancy Robitaille vs Ting Li / Jennifer Mashaw7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLauren Recchia vs Marla Vogel6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Hayashi / Stephanie Hiemel vs Amy Jarocki / Diane Rehm1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-02vs NetchixLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorgia Wohnsen / Amy van den Broek vs Amy Jarocki / Monica Bracken3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Eager vs Marla Vogel1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Hayashi / Lara MacLachlan vs Nancy Quinn / Diane Rehm6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-25vs NetchixLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Hawver / Lisa Balboa vs Brooke Roberts / Amy Jarocki3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Recchia vs Marla Vogel6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGeorgia Wohnsen / Sarah O'higgins vs Diane Rehm / Shannon Kete6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Cecilia Levy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.38
Mallory Massry
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.31
Nancy Robitaille
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.28
Lauren Recchia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Rachel Eager
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.19
Jessica Hayashi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Georgia Wohnsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.14
Amy van den Broek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lara MacLachlan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Balboa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melanie Hawver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah O'higgins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Hiemel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mallory Massry + Lauren Recchia123 matchesnot enough data
Mallory Massry + Nancy Robitaille303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecilia Levy
2W–1L career · type D · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Mallory Massry
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Nancy Robitaille
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Lauren Recchia
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Rachel Eager
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Jessica Hayashi
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Georgia Wohnsen
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Amy van den Broek
4W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
Lara MacLachlan
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Balboa
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Hawver
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sarah O'higgins
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Hiemel
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.