Teams

Je.Komes18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-30vs Sa.Forman18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKeeley McCormick vs Christina Hyde6-3, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJenny Komes vs Corinna Proctor1-6, 3-6
2025-07-23vs Je.Boney18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKeisha Demps vs Bridget Whalen6-0, 6-0
2025-07-16vs Br.Humphrey18S3.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesKeisha Demps vs Sara Lilley6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Carrie Patrick6-1, 6-3
2025-07-13vs Kr.Esham18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesKeisha Demps vs Catie Cunningham6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesVinaya Verghese vs Meghan Richardson4-6, 5-7
2025-07-09vs Ma.Cambo18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Shanie Kpanay6-1, 6-1
2025-07-02vs Vi.Gibbs18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJenny Komes vs Vickie Gibbs6-3, 6-2
2025-06-11vs Ly.Summitt18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKeisha Demps vs Meredith Penn6-1, 6-3
2025-06-04vs Ki.Meeker18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Kimberlie Meeker3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesVinaya Verghese vs Cooper Tharrington6-3, 6-4
2025-05-28vs Sp.Menzel18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesVanessa Garrido vs Devon Brewer6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKeeley McCormick vs Liz Bottoms6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Alison Sinclair
published 3.5
3.44
Amber Bowden
published 3.5
3.41
Keisha Demps
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Vanessa Garrido
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.12
Gigi Martin
published
2.98
Jenny Komes
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.94
Vinaya Verghese
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.93
Keeley McCormick
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vinaya Verghese + Jenny Komes7463% games+4.3% vs expected
Jenny Komes + Alison Sinclair404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Sinclair
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Amber Bowden
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Keisha Demps
98W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Vanessa Garrido
67W–31L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Gigi Martin
12W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Jenny Komes
120W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Vinaya Verghese
111W–126L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Keeley McCormick
47W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.