Teams

Ma.Cambo18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-23vs Vi.Gibbs18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesErika Peterson vs Annie Flowers6-2, 6-3
2025-07-16vs Ly.Summitt18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesKathryn Horneffer vs Lynnsy Summitt6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJolie LeBrun vs Mandy Steinhardt6-2, 6-1
2025-07-16vs Kr.Esham18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Kari Knoblauch3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJolie LeBrun vs Kathryn Shields3-6, 0-6
2025-07-09vs Je.Komes18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKathryn Horneffer vs Gigi Martin6-1, 6-4
L#3 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Amber Bowden4-6, 0-6
2025-06-25vs Ki.Meeker18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Kimberlie Meeker3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJolie LeBrun vs Jennifer Lawrence3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-18vs Me.Paris18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Melissa Ferrell6-0, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKathryn Horneffer vs Meredith Piper6-1, 6-3
2025-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesErika Peterson vs Amanda Moore6-0, 6-1
2025-06-04vs Sa.Forman18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesKathryn Horneffer vs Allison Dugan6-1, 6-1
2025-05-28vs Br.Humphrey18S3.0Lost 01
L#2 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Mary Long2-6, 4-6
2025-05-21vs Je.Boney18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesJolie LeBrun vs Samantha Brody Moses6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Erika Peterson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Kathryn Horneffer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Maggie Finney
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Madeline Cambo
published
3.10
Juliana Treleven
published
2.81
Jolie LeBrun
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Shanie Kpanay
published
2.42
Taylor Hawkland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Peterson + Madeline Cambo404 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Horneffer + Madeline Cambo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Peterson
75W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Kathryn Horneffer
72W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Maggie Finney
34W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Madeline Cambo
28W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Juliana Treleven
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Jolie LeBrun
43W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Shanie Kpanay
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.70
Taylor Hawkland
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.