Teams

Dream Team All Stars

2023 Mixed Tri-Level 18 & Over · Mx 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · Mx 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The mixed nuts/Huchet7117719173
2Triple Mixers/Cimarolli7115923192
3Super Dragon Ball/Chien/Sumino5212921176
4Donut drive in/Hammond4415923192
5Matched to smash/Wei44131124167
6Break Point/Wedick34101124170
7Set Offenders/Shouldis2551634226
8No Love, just Sets/Shouldis1661533215
9Dream Team All Stars1761838245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Michael Lesko
published
3.88
William Schlueter
published
3.79
Antoinette Kovar
published 4.5
3.72
Ali Javaheri
published 4
3.72
Jeffrey Harris
published
3.63
Erica Yalavarthi
published
3.38
Shelley Fridley
published
3.36
John Brinkmeyer
published
3.29
Richard Dickerson
published
3.10
Mary Handley
published
3.06
Amy Fikes
published 3.5
2.93
Malak Itani
published
2.63
Tom Rhoads
published
Megan Kovacs
published
Ryan Worth
published
Trina Ngo
published
William Woods
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Lesko
72W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
4.15
William Schlueter
70W–90L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.88
4.5
Antoinette Kovar
77W–69L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.79
4
Angela Muzzarelli
29W–74L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ali Javaheri
110W–88L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Jeffrey Harris
122W–91L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Erica Yalavarthi
157W–81L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Shelley Fridley
36W–86L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
John Brinkmeyer
73W–69L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36
Richard Dickerson
27W–58L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.29
Mary Handley
85W–79L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Fikes
84W–61L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Malak Itani
35W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Tom Rhoads
57W–61L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Megan Kovacs
14W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Worth
48W–47L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trina Ngo
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Woods
44W–71L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.