Teams

Williams/OFRC 40s 3.5M Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 3.5 40 & Over Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-15vs Kreager 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelton Williams / Danny Carter vs Kenton Kreager / Robert Davis1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChad Brasington / Chad Davis vs Kevin Roley / Lee Schneiderman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Paul Tapler vs Stephen Miller / Graham Summerlee2-6, 3-6
2025-05-08vs Jackson 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Tapler / Danny Carter vs David Rachels / Kevin Herndon2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Robert Cockman vs Alex Partagas / William Johnson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-24vs Dover 40s 3.5M Thurs PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad Brasington / Creighton Vaught vs Jagdeep Singh / Christopher Moser4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChad Davis / Charles Coble vs Russell Loseke / Frederick Barakat6-2, 6-4
2025-04-17vs Carwile 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Creighton Vaught vs Peter Amidon / Richard Crutchfield6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDanny Carter / Charles Coble vs Kevin Hulse / Matt Messick7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChad Davis / Robert Cockman vs Tan Ren / Robert Goodman0-6, 1-6
2025-04-10vs Hilliard 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelton Williams / Robert Cockman vs Wade Legette / Tim Hayworth5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Chad Davis vs Brian Smith / Chris Sigley1-6, 1-6
2025-04-03vs Clowers 40s 3.5M ThursWon 21
W#1 DoublesChad Brasington / Creighton Vaught vs Rick Dutch / Michael Hoggard6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDanny Carter / Chad Davis vs Roy Malac / Ed Widman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Ben Sheppard vs Diego Waegeli / Felipe Gonzalez0-6, 0-6
2025-03-27vs Ward/Gilman 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Robert Cockman vs Jeffery Ward / Shiladitya Paul2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShelton Williams / Danny Carter vs Brian Henderson / Jeff Cunningham6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChad Davis / Paul Tapler vs Bill Watson / DAREN BARNES2-6, 3-6
2025-03-20vs Whichard 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Charles Coble vs Kevin Grubb / Martin Mailloux1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChad Brasington / Chad Davis vs Steven Delamar / Bill Vary1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Cockman / Danny Carter vs Chris Whichard / Thomas Williams2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesShelton Williams / Charles Coble vs Glenn Vainwright / Brooke Hartwick3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChad Davis / Chad Brasington vs Matthew Wakefield / Chad Lackey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBen Sheppard / Robert Cockman vs Taylor Ott / Jason Beuchler0-6, 0-6
2025-03-06vs Rossato 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 02
L#2 DoublesDanny van Fleet / Chad Brasington vs Kevin Womble / Jesse Chandler2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChad Davis / Paul Tapler vs Bobby Powell / Ian Patrick3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 40 & Over Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charles Coble
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Creighton Vaught
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Danny van Fleet
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.06
Chad Brasington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Chad Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Paul Tapler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Robert Cockman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Ben Sheppard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shelton Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danny van Fleet + Robert Cockman0536% games−2.7% vs expected
Paul Tapler + Chad Davis1543% games−4.0% vs expected
Danny van Fleet + Creighton Vaught123 matchesnot enough data
Chad Brasington + Creighton Vaught123 matchesnot enough data
Chad Brasington + Chad Davis033 matchesnot enough data
Chad Davis + Ben Sheppard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Coble
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Creighton Vaught
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Danny van Fleet
8W–19L career · 8 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Chad Brasington
3W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Chad Davis
9W–19L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
Paul Tapler
6W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Robert Cockman
3W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
Ben Sheppard
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.46
Shelton Williams
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.