Teams

Carwile 40s 3.5M Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 3.5 40 & Over Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesEric Carwile / Peter Amidon vs Jason Beuchler / Brooke Hartwick6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Kuebert / Kevin Hulse vs Ames Chamberlin / Joseph Speight5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTan Ren / Timothy Shantry vs Vince Howard / Taylor Ott6-1, 6-2
2025-04-17vs Williams/OFRC 40s 3.5M Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Amidon / Richard Crutchfield vs Danny van Fleet / Creighton Vaught7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKevin Hulse / Matt Messick vs Danny Carter / Charles Coble6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTan Ren / Robert Goodman vs Chad Davis / Robert Cockman6-0, 6-1
2025-04-10vs Dover 40s 3.5M Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesEric Carwile / Kevin Hulse vs Luke Rhoten / Christopher Moser3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Shantry / Matt Messick vs Kevin Dover / Jagdeep Singh2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTan Ren / Ry Adams vs Ryan Kraska / Vince Credle4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-27vs Clowers 40s 3.5M ThursWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Kuebert / Peter Amidon vs Dennis Stearns / David Sar6-2, 4-1
W#2 DoublesTan Ren / Richard Crutchfield vs Diego Waegeli / Felipe Gonzalez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTimothy Shantry / Matt Messick vs Rick Dutch / Leon Rives6-0, 6-1
2025-03-13vs Ward/Gilman 40s 3.5M Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesRy Adams / Brian Kuebert vs Bill Watson / Stephen Romaine6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMatt Messick / Andrew Bray vs Jeffery Ward / DAREN BARNES3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Carwile / Robert Goodman vs John Hizer / Ryan Preda6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 40 & Over Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Nate Kaufmann
published
3.39
Timothy Shantry
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Richard Crutchfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Kevin Hulse
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Brian Kuebert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Matt Messick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Tan Ren
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Ry Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Andrew Bray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Eric Carwile
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Peter Amidon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Crutchfield + Peter Amidon213 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Shantry + Matt Messick213 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Shantry + Tan Ren213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nate Kaufmann
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Timothy Shantry
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Richard Crutchfield
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Kevin Hulse
19W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Brian Kuebert
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Messick
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Tan Ren
20W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Ry Adams
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Andrew Bray
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Eric Carwile
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Peter Amidon
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.