Teams

Davis 40s 4.0M Wed PM

2026 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-05-06vs Jackson 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Rodenbough / Corey Davis vs Aravindh Raj Sankara Narayanan / Ted Irvin7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesWilliam Crabtree / Tony McGraw vs Anthony Jackson / Todd Hurst6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLawrence Cox / NAGARAJAN MOHAN vs Kevin Navarro / Scott Laughlin7-6, 6-4
2026-03-21vs Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 4.0M Wed PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesRod Schwartz / Corey Davis vs Eric Biesecker / Art Fadde1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Crabtree / Tony McGraw vs Matthew Skeen / Jason Beuchler6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJohn Graves / Charles Dawson vs Brian McLeod / Jeff Reichard6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Mark Teears
published
3.82
William Crabtree
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Corey Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Charles Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Tony McGraw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
John Rodenbough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Rod Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Lawrence Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
NAGARAJAN MOHAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Rodenbough + Tony McGraw3253% games−2.9% vs expected
Charles Dawson + Mark Teears303 matchesnot enough data
William Crabtree + Tony McGraw213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Teears
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
William Crabtree
23W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Corey Davis
45W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Charles Dawson
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Tony McGraw
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
John Rodenbough
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Rod Schwartz
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Lawrence Cox
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
NAGARAJAN MOHAN
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.