Teams

PTSA

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

15 players · average NTRP 4.35 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-13vs Pocket AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria Hildebrand / Robert Miranda vs Susan Hopkey / Fazal Shariff1-6, 3-6
2022-09-08vs PTSDLost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Caven / Steven Caven vs Donna Polk / Brad Hines3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-01vs TennisitySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMadelyn Reid / Steven Caven vs Vicki McBride / Paul Hefner6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesVictoria Hildebrand / Jacob Sessions vs Kelly Wedeven / Alex Wong4-6, 2-6
2022-08-30vs RacketeersWon 10
W#3 DoublesBecky Caven / Steven Caven vs Bill Sharp / Gina Sharp6-1, 6-3
2022-08-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Caven / Steven Caven vs Paula Lawson / Sam Elsethagen2-6, 5-7
2022-08-23vs ETC Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#3 DoublesBecky Caven / Steven Caven vs Lisa Sliger / Greg Knudsen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-16vs PTSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesBecky Caven / Steven Caven vs Jayme Sullivan / Mark Rice6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Get Your Shot Together11129718236
2PTSA102251126254
3ETC Backhanded Compliments66201640330
4Racketeers57142249359
5PTSD01272965411

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Madelyn Reid
published 5
4.56
Zachary Fohn
published 4.5
4.39
Austin Miller
published 4.5
4.34
Andrea Gillis
published 4.5
Nick Wecker
published 4.5
4.17
Pratap Murali
published 4.5
4.11
Hanna Jacobs
published 4.5
4.05
Vanessa Almaraz
published 4.5
4.00
Robert Miranda
published 4
3.97
Kristen Jacobs
published 4
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.62
Becky Caven
published 4
3.62
Jacob Sessions
published 4
Steven Caven
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Victoria Hildebrand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hanna Jacobs + Zachary Fohn15271% games+9.7% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Jacob Sessions13262% games+4.2% vs expected
Jacob Sessions + Vanessa Almaraz12354% games+2.5% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Robert Miranda17858% games+0.6% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Pratap Murali161849% games−3.4% vs expected
Steven Caven + Becky Caven423454% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Hildebrand + Jacob Sessions2844% gamesnot enough data
Madelyn Reid + Robert Miranda5164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Madelyn Reid
55W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Zachary Fohn
150W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
4.56
4.5
Austin Miller
57W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Andrea Gillis
98W–57L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Nick Wecker
41W–54L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Pratap Murali
99W–69L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Hanna Jacobs
91W–66L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Vanessa Almaraz
106W–105L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Robert Miranda
241W–112L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Kristen Jacobs
212W–92L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Becky Caven
228W–146L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Jacob Sessions
109W–73L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Steven Caven
82W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Victoria Hildebrand
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.